Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:09:13.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasingly Radical Claims about Heredity and Fitness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Eugene Earnshaw-Whyte
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the classical account of evolution by natural selection (ENS) found in Lewontin and many subsequent authors, ENS is conceived as involving three key ingredients: phenotypic variation, fitness differences, and heredity. Through the analysis of three problem cases involving heredity, I argue that the classical conception is substantially flawed, showing that heredity is not required for selection. I consider further problems with the classical account of ENS arising from conflations between three distinct senses of the central concept of ‘fitness’ and offer an alternative to the classical conception of ENS involving the interaction of distinct evolutionary mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 396 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Denis Walsh, Mohan Matthen, Jean Gayon, and my anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions and comments.

References

Beatty, John. 1984. “Chance and Natural Selection.” Philosophy of Science 51:183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, John. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2007. “Conditions for Evolution by Natural Selection.” Journal of Philosophy 104:489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2008. “In Search of General Evolutionary Principles: Why Darwinism Is Too Important to Be Left to the Biologists.” Journal of Bioecononomics 10:51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. 1980. “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:311–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L., Langman, Rodney E., and Glenn, Sigrid S.. 2001. “A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology, and Behavior.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:511–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, Andre. 2002. “Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness and Natural Selection.” Journal of Philosophy 44 (2): 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, Andre. 2005. “How to Understand Causal Relations in Natural Selection: Reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard.” Biology and Philosophy 20:355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, Andre. 2009. “Selection and Causation.” Philosophy of Science 76:201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Susan K., and Beatty, John H.. 1979. “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.” Philosophy of Science 46:263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2002. “Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?” Biology and Philosophy 17:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Mark. 1986. Evolution. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1991/2006. “Models of Cultural Evolution.” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 3rd ed., ed. Elliott Sober, 535–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Originally published in Paul Griffiths, ed., Trees of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Lewontin, Richard C.. 1980. “Artifact, Cause and Genic Selection.” Philosophy of Science 49:157–80.Google Scholar
Stephens, Christopher. 2004. “Selection, Drift, and the ‘Forces’ of Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 71:550–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Denis M., Lewens, Tim, and Ariew, Andre. 2002. “The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Random Drift.” Philosophy of Science 69:452–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar