Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:31:40.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grades of Inductive Skepticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Brian Skyrms
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is not a unique inductive skeptical position; there are grades of inductive skepticism. There is nothing much to say about complete skepticism, but some more restricted skeptical positions may be profitably analyzed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 303 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayes, Thomas. 1763. “An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 53:376–418.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Jacob. 1713/1713. Ars Conjectandi. Basil: Thurnisiorum. Trans. Edith Dudley Sylla as The Art of Conjecturing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Billingsley, Patrick. 1965. Ergodic Theory and Information. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cifarelli, Donato, and Regazzini, Eugenio. 1996. “De Finetti’s Contribution to Probability and Statistics.” Statistical Science 11:2253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Finetti, Bruno. 1937/1937. “La Prevision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives.” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare 1:1–68. Trans. as “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources.” In Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. Henry Kyburg Jr. and Howard Smokler. Huntington, NY: Kreiger.Google Scholar
de Finetti, Bruno 1938/1938. Sur la condition d’équivalence partielle. Actualités Scientifiques et Industrialles 739. Paris: Hermann & Cie. Trans. Paul Benacerraf and Richard Jeffrey as “On the Condition of Partial Exchangeability.” In Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, ed. Richard Jeffrey, 193–205. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Finetti, Bruno 1972. Probability, Induction and Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Finetti, Bruno 1974. Theory of Probability. Vol. 1. Trans. Antonio Machi and Adrian Smith. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Finetti, Bruno 1975. Theory of Probability. Vol. 2. Trans. Antonio Machi and Adrian Smith. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
de Moivre, Abraham. 1718. The Doctrine of Chances; or, A Method of Calculating the Probability of Events in Play. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Diaconis, Persi, and Freedman, David. 1980a. “De Finetti’s Generalizations of Exchangeability.” In Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, ed. Richard Jeffrey, 232–49. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaconis, Persi, and Freedman, David 1980b. “Finite Exchangeable Sequences.” Annals of Probability 8:745–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaconis, Persi, and Freedman, David 1988. “On the Consistency of Bayes Estimates.” Annals of Statistics 14:1–67.Google Scholar
Diogenes, Laërtius. 1925. Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Trans. Hicks, Robert D.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Doob, Joseph L. 1948. “Application of the Theory of Martingales.” In Actes du Colloque International Le Calcul des Probabilités et ses applications, 23–27. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Freedman, David. 1962. “Mixtures of Markov Processes.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33 (1): 114–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, Donald A. 1987. “Was Bayes a Bayesian?” Historia Mathematica 14:325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Michael. 1983. “The Prevision of a Prevision.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 78:817–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Edwin, and Savage, Leonard J.. 1955. “Symmetric Measures on Cartesian Products.” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 80:470–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David 1748/1748. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. London: Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1896. A Treatise of Human Nature. ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan. 1656/1656. Van Rekeningh in Speelen van Geluck. Trans. van Schooten, F. as “Libellus de Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae.” In Exercitationum Mathematicarum, appendix. Leiden: Elsevirii.Google Scholar
van Schooten, F. 1656/1656. Van Rekeningh in Speelen van Geluck. Trans. Arbuthnot, John as Of the Laws of Chance. London: Motte.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, John 1656/1656. Van Rekeningh in Speelen van Geluck. Trans. Browne, W. as The Value of All Chances in Games of Fortune; Cards, Dice Lotteries &c. Mathematically Demonstrated. London: Keimer & Woodward.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard. 1965. The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw-Hill (2nd ed.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard 1968. “Probable Knowledge.” In The Problem of Inductive Logic, ed. Lakatos, I., 166–80. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Joyce, James M. 1998. “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism.” Philosophy of Science 65:575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, Andrey Nikolaevitch. 1933/1933. Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin: Springer. Trans. Nathan Morrison as Foundations of the Theory of Probability. New York: Chelsea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplace, Pierre Simon. 1774/1774. “Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les événemens.” Savants étranges 6:621–56. Trans. Stephen Stigler as “Memoir on the Probability of the Causes of Events.” Statistical Science 1:359–78.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1934/1934. Logik der Forshung. Vienna: Springer. Trans. as The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 2nd ed. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1763. Preface to “An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 53:370–76.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1938. Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. 1990. The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian 2006. “Diachronic Coherence and Radical Probabilism.” Philosophy of Science 73:959–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, Stephen. 1990. The History of Statistics. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen 2013. “The True Title of Bayes’ Essay.” Statistical Science 28 (3): 283–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas. 1984. “Belief and the Will.” Journal of Philosophy 81:235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabell, Sandy L. 1989. “The Rule of Succession.” Erkenntnis 31:283–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabell, Sandy L. 1997. “The Continuum of Inductive Methods Revisited.” In The Cosmos of Science, ed. Norton, J. and Earman, J., 351–85. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 2002. “It All Adds Up: The Dynamic Coherence of Radical Probabilism.” Philosophy of Science 69 (Proceedings): S98–S103.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 2009. “De Finetti, Chance and Quantum Physics.” In Bruno de Finetti: Radical Probabilist, ed. Galavotti, Maria Carla, 59–83. London: College.Google Scholar