Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:02:25.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glymour on Evidential Relevance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

David Christensen
David Christensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, UCLA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glymour's “bootstrap” account of confirmation is designed to provide an analysis of evidential relevance, which has been a serious problem for hypothetico-deductivism. As set out in Theory and Evidence, however, the “bootstrap” condition allows confirmation in clear cases of evidential irrelevance. The difficulties with Glymour's account seem to be due to a basic feature which it shares with hypothetico-deductive accounts, and which may explain why neither can give a satisfactory analysis of evidential relevance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 471 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Paul Horwich, an anonymous referee, and especially Richard Healey for helpful discussions and/or comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Edidin, A. (1981), “Glymour on Confirmation”, Philosophy of Science 48: 292–307.10.1086/288998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, C. (1980a), Theory and Evidence. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. (1980b), “Bootstraps and Probabilities”, Journal of Philosophy LXXVII: 691–699.10.5840/jphil198077118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. (1978), “An Appraisal of Glymour's Confirmation Theory”, Journal of Philosophy LXXV: 98–113.10.2307/2025688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. (1980), “The Dispensability of Bootstrap Conditions”, Journal of Philosophy LXXVII: 699–702.10.5840/jphil198077119CrossRefGoogle Scholar