Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T13:16:32.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Arguments and Local Realism About the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Harold Kincaid
Harold Kincaid*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Deparment of Philosophy, 900 13th St. South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1260.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that realism issue in the social sciences is not one that can be decided by general philosophical arguments that evaluate entire domains at once. The realism issue is instead many different empirical issues. To defend these claims, I sort issues that are often run together, explicate and criticize several standard realist and antirealist arguments about the social sciences, and use the example of the productive/nonproductive distinction to illustrate the approach to realism questions that I favor.

Type
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S667 - S678
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boss, Helen (1990), Theories of Surplus and Transfer. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard (1983), “The Current Status of Scientific Realism”, Erkenntis 19: 45–90.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob (1994), “The Earth Is Round (p <.05)”, American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John (1993), “Could There Be a Science of Economics?”, in French, Peter, Uehling, T., and Wettstein, Howard (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume XVIII: Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 000–000.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1995), Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Phillip (1993), The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan (1990), “Are Economic Kinds Natural Kinds?”, in Savage, Wade (ed.), Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 000–000.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander (1980), Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. (1992), Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. C. C. (1989), Our Place in the Universe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trout, J. D. (1998), Measuring the Intentional World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael (1996), Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar