Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T20:17:57.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Generational Cycle of State Spaces and Adequate Genetical Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Elisabeth A. Lloyd ,
Richard C. Lewontin  and
Marcus W. Feldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most models of generational succession in sexually reproducing populations necessarily move back and forth between genic and genotypic spaces. We show that transitions between and within these spaces are usually hidden by unstated assumptions about processes in these spaces. We also examine a widely endorsed claim regarding the mathematical equivalence of kin-, group-, individual-, and allelic-selection models made by Lee Dugatkin and Kern Reeve. We show that the claimed mathematical equivalence of the models does not hold.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 140 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R., and Borgia, G. (1978), “Group Selection, Altruism, and the Levels of Organization of Life”, Group Selection, Altruism, and the Levels of Organization of Life 9:449–475.Google Scholar
Bodmer, W. F. (1965), “Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models”, Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models 51:411–424.Google ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. (1978), “Darwinian Selection and ‘Altruism’”, Darwinian Selection and ‘Altruism’ 14:268–280.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. (1981), Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, B., and Giesel, J. T. (1972), “Selection in Populations with Overlapping Generations; II. Relations between Gene Frequency and Demographic Variables”, Selection in Populations with Overlapping Generations; II. Relations between Gene Frequency and Demographic Variables 106:388–401.Google Scholar
Colwell, R. K. (1981), “Group Selection Is Implicated in the Evolution of Female-Biased Sex Ratios”, Group Selection Is Implicated in the Evolution of Female-Biased Sex Ratios 290:401–404.Google Scholar
Crow, J., and Aoki, K. (1982), “Group Selection for a Polygenic Behavioral Trait: A Differential Proliferation Model”, Group Selection for a Polygenic Behavioral Trait: A Differential Proliferation Model 79:2628–2631.Google ScholarPubMed
Dugatkin, L. A., and Reeve, H. K. (1994), “Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy”, Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy 23:101–133.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. W., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1976), “Cultural and Biological Evolutionary Processes, Selection for a Trait under Complex Transmission”, Cultural and Biological Evolutionary Processes, Selection for a Trait under Complex Transmission 9:239–259.Google ScholarPubMed
Forber, P. (2008), “On Biological Possibility and Confirmation”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P., and Lewontin, R. (1993), “The Dimensions of Selection”, The Dimensions of Selection 60:375–395.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. (2005), Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, B., and Godfrey-Smith, P. (2002), “Individualist and Multi-level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations”, Individualist and Multi-level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations 17:477–517.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974), The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1987), “The Confirmation of Evolutionary and Ecological Models”, The Confirmation of Evolutionary and Ecological Models 2:277–293.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (1994), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (2005), “Why the Gene Will Not Return”, Why the Gene Will Not Return 72:287–310.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1987), “How to Model Evolution”, in Dupré, J. (ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 147–150.Google Scholar
Michod, R. (1982), “The Theory of Kin Selection”, The Theory of Kin Selection 13:23–55.Google Scholar
Queller, D. C. (1992a), “A General Model for Kin Selection”, A General Model for Kin Selection 46:376–380.Google Scholar
Queller, D. C. (1992b), “Quantitative Genetics, Inclusive Fitness, and Group Selection”, Quantitative Genetics, Inclusive Fitness, and Group Selection 139:540–558.Google Scholar
Skipper, R. A. Jr. (2004), “Calibration of Laboratory Models in Population Genetics”, Calibration of Laboratory Models in Population Genetics 12:369–393.Google Scholar
Sober, E., and Wilson, D. S. (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (1996), “The Return of the Group”, The Return of the Group 63:562–584.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K., and Griffiths, P. E. (1999), Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uyenoyama, M. K., and Feldman, M. W. (1980), “Evolution of Altruism under Group Selection in Large and Small Populations in Fluctuating Environments”, Evolution of Altruism under Group Selection in Large and Small Populations in Fluctuating Environments 17:380–414.Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1985), “Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection”, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection 125:61–73.Google Scholar
Waters, C. K. (2005), “Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay”, Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay 72:311–333.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1980), The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar