Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:42:03.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feyerabend's Retreat from Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

John Preston
John Preston*
Affiliation:
The University of Reading
*
†Department of Philosophy, The University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AA, England; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In attempting to assess the legacy of Paul Feyerabend's philosophical work, matters are complicated by the fact that there was a change in his basic orientation towards the philosophy of science around the end of the 1960s. Here I shall indicate one aspect of Feyerabend's divided legacy. My main aims are to sketch the principal themes in his (fairly extensive but little-known) 1990s output, to situate that later output insofar as it bears on the realism/antirealism debate, and (rather precipitously, perhaps) to identify what I take to be the single common premise of his entire philosophical work.

Type
Symposium: Paul Feyerabend and His Legacy
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 64 , Issue S4: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Dec., 1997 , 1997 , pp. S421 - S431
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1979), Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975), Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1978), Science in a Free Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1981a), Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1981b), Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1991), Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1992a), “Ethics as a Measure of Scientific Truth”, in Shea, W. R. and Spadafora, A. (eds.), From the Twilight of Probability: Ethics and Politics. Canton, MA: Science History Publications, pp. 106–114.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1992b), “Nature as a Work of Art”, Common Knowledge 1: 3–9.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1993), “The End of Epistemology?”, in Earman, J. et al. (eds.), J. Earman et al. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1994), “Art as a Product of Nature as a Work of Art”, World Futures 40: 87–100.10.1080/02604027.1994.9972421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (forthcoming), “Preface” to the 3rd edition of Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1981), “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49.10.1086/288975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981), The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203317211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, J. M. (1997), Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Preston, J. M. (forthcoming), “Feyerabend in the 90s”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. (1987), Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar