Article contents
Abstract
Common probabilistic fallacies and putative paradoxes are surveyed, including those arising from distribution repartitioning, from the reordering of expectation series, and from misconceptions regarding expected and almost certain gains in games of chance. Conditions are given for such games to be well-posed. By way of example, Bernoulli's “Petersburg Paradox” and Hacking's “Strange Expectations” are discussed and the latter are resolved. Feller's generalized “fair price, in the classical sense” is critically reviewed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984
References
Eisen, M. (1969), Introduction to Mathematical Probability Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1945), “Note on the Law of Large Numbers and ‘Fair’ Games”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 16: 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1968), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1. New York & London: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1980), “Strange Expectations”, Philosophy of Science 47: 562–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. (1973), “The Well-Posed Problem”, Foundations of Physics 3: 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, A. (1983), “The Fallacy of Intrinsic Distributions”, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by