Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:31:55.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanation and the Evolutionary First Law(s)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Devin Y. Gouvêa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analogies between Newtonian mechanics and evolutionary processes are powerful but not infinitely versatile tools for generating explanations of particular biological phenomena. Their explanatory range is sensitive to a preliminary decision about which processes count as background conditions and which as special forces. Here I argue that the defenders of the zero-force evolutionary law are mistaken in defending their decision as the only appropriate one. The Hardy–Weinberg principle remains a viable option that is consistent with the epistemic role of Newton’s own first law, and the strengths and weaknesses of each analogy are sufficiently distinct to justify their continued coexistence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 363 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Brandon Fogel, Kalie Kissoon, Trevor Pearce, Bob Richards, Beckett Sterner, Bill Sterner, Bill Wimsatt, and two anonymous reviewers for their help at various stages of this project.

References

Ayala, Francisco J. 1982. Population and Evolutionary Genetics: A Primer. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Barrett, Martin, Clatterbuck, Hayley, Goldsby, Michael, Helgeson, Casey, McLoone, Brian, Pearce, Trevor, Sober, Elliott, Stern, Reuben, and Weinberger, Naftali. 2012. “Puzzles for ZFEL, McShea and Brandon’s Zero Force Evolutionary Law.” Biology and Philosophy 27:723–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John. 1981. “What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?” In PSA 1980: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, ed. Peter D. Asquith and Ronald N. Giere, 397–426. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 2006. “The Principle of Drift: Biology’s First Law.” Journal of Philosophy 113:319–35.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 2010a. “A Non-Newtonian Model of Evolution: The ZFEL View.” Philosophy of Science 77:702–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. 2010b. “The ZFEL Explanation of Macro-evolutionary Diversity.” Paper presented at the Philosophy of Biology at Madison Workshop, Madison, WI, May 23.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N., and McShea, Daniel W.. 2012. “Four Solutions for Four Puzzles.” Biology and Philosophy 27:737–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 2002. “Newton’s Concepts of Force and Mass, with Notes on the Laws of Motion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., 57–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. W. F. 2008. “G. H. Hardy (1908) and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.” Genetics 179:1143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, Doug. 2011. “ZFEL in Paleontological Perspective.” Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology, Salt Lake City, UT, July 11.Google Scholar
Filler, Joshua. 2009. “Newtonian Forces and Evolutionary Biology: A Problem and Solution for Extending the Force Interpretation.” Philosophy of Science 76:774–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filler, Joshua 2011. “Essays on Evolution and Explanation.” PhD diss., University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John H. 2004. Population Genetics: A Concise Guide. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Matthew B. 2009. Population Genetics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hartl, Daniel L. 1980. Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher, and Velasco, Joel D.. 2014. “Evolutionary and Newtonian Forces.” Ergo 1:39–77.Google Scholar
Huang, Lily. 2011. “Can Selection Be Background?” Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology, Salt Lake City, UT, July 11.Google Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, André. 2002. “Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness and Natural Selection.” Journal of Philosophy 99:55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, André 2009. “Selection and Causation.” Philosophy of Science 76:201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, Daniel W., and Brandon, Robert N.. 2010. Biology’s First Law: The Tendency for Diversity and Complexity to Increase in Evolutionary Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medawar, Peter B. 1960. The Future of Man: The BBC Reith Lectures 1959. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. Cohen, I. Bernard, Whitman, Anne, and Budenz, Julia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Raup, David M. 1987. “Neutral Models in Paleobiology.” In Neutral Models in Biology, ed. Nitecki, Matthew H. and Hoffman, Antoni, 121–32. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, Jonathan. 1979. Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1971. “Is the Theory of Evolution Different?” Pt. 1, “The Central Core of the Theory.” Scientia 106:765–83.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Robert C., ed. 1975. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written from 1856 to 1858. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, Christopher. 2004. “Selection, Drift, and the ‘Forces’ of Evolution.” Philosophy of Science 71:550–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Christopher 2010. “Forces and Causes in Evolutionary Theory.” Philosophy of Science 77:716–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, Alan R. 2006. Population Genetics and Microevolutionary Theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Liss.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torretti, Roberto. 1999. The Philosophy of Physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2011. “McShea and Brandon’s Zero-Force Evolutionary Law (ZFEL) and the Distinction between Passive and Driven Evolutionary Trends.” Paper presented at the 2011 meeting of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology, Salt Lake City, UT, July 11.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis M. 2000. “Chasing Shadows: Natural Selection and Adaptation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 31:135–53.Google Scholar
Walsh, Denis M., Lewens, Tim, and Ariew, André. 2002. “The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Random Drift.” Philosophy of Science 69:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar