Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Perović, Slobodan
Radovanović, Sandro
Sikimić, Vlasta
and
Berber, Andrea
2016.
Optimal research team composition: data envelopment analysis of Fermilab experiments.
Scientometrics,
Vol. 108,
Issue. 1,
p.
83.
Tamburrini, Guglielmo
2016.
Machine intelligence sports as research programs.
PARADIGMI,
p.
163.
Koponen, I.T.
Kokkonen, T.
and
Nousiainen, M.
2017.
Modelling sociocognitive aspects of students’ learning.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,
Vol. 470,
Issue. ,
p.
68.
Pöyhönen, Samuli
2017.
Value of cognitive diversity in science.
Synthese,
Vol. 194,
Issue. 11,
p.
4519.
Martini, Carlo
and
Fernández Pinto, Manuela
2017.
Modeling the social organization of science.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
221.
Fumagalli, Roberto
2018.
Who is afraid of scientific imperialism?.
Synthese,
Vol. 195,
Issue. 9,
p.
4125.
Frey, Daniel
and
Šešelja, Dunja
2018.
What Is the Epistemic Function of Highly Idealized Agent-Based Models of Scientific Inquiry?.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 4,
p.
407.
Herfeld, Catherine
and
Doehne, Malte
2018.
Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
p.
1.
O'Connor, Cailin
2019.
The natural selection of conservative science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 76,
Issue. ,
p.
24.
Devezer, Berna
Nardin, Luis G.
Baumgaertner, Bert
Buzbas, Erkan Ozge
and
Fanelli, Daniele
2019.
Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
e0216125.
Currie, Adrian
2019.
Existential risk, creativity & well-adapted science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 76,
Issue. ,
p.
39.
Koponen, Ismo T.
2019.
Modeling and Simulation of Social-Behavioral Phenomena in Creative Societies.
Vol. 1079,
Issue. ,
p.
82.
Bedessem, Baptiste
2019.
The division of cognitive labor: two missing dimensions of the debate.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
Grim, Patrick
2019.
Modeling Epistemology: Examples and Analysis in Computational Philosophy of Science.
p.
1.
Heesen, Remco
2019.
The credit incentive to be a maverick.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 76,
Issue. ,
p.
5.
Rolin, Kristina
2019.
The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology.
p.
158.
Harnagel, Audrey
2019.
A mid-level approach to modeling scientific communities.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 76,
Issue. ,
p.
49.
Avin, Shahar
2019.
Centralized Funding and Epistemic Exploration.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 3,
p.
629.
WHEELER, BILLY
2019.
COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN METAPHYSICS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS.
Manuscrito,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3,
p.
108.
Borg, AnneMarie
Frey, Daniel
Šešelja, Dunja
and
Straßer, Christian
2019.
Theory-choice, transient diversity and the efficiency of scientific inquiry.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,