Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:00:41.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does von Neumann Entropy Correspond to Thermodynamic Entropy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Eugene Y. S. Chua
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that the von Neumann entropy corresponds to thermodynamic entropy, but Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker have recently argued against this view by attacking von Neumann’s argument. I argue that Hemmo and Shenker’s arguments fail because of several misunderstandings about statistical-mechanical and thermodynamic domains of applicability, about the nature of mixed states, and about the role of approximations in physics. As a result, their arguments fail in all cases: in the single-particle case, the finite-particles case, and the infinite-particles case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 145 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Craig Callender, Eddy Keming Chen, Erik Curiel, Tim Maudlin, John Norton, Sai Ying Ng, Adrian K. Yee, and participants at the 2019 summer school The Nature of Entropy I for their feedback, discussion, and comments—they have contributed to this article in one way or another. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for pushing me to improve on various aspects of this article.

References

Callender, C. 2001. “Taking Thermodynamics Too Seriously.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 32 (4): 539–53..Google Scholar
Compagner, A. 1989. “Thermodynamics as the Continuum Limit of Statistical Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics 57:106–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deville, A., and Deville, Y.. 2013. “Clarifying the Link between von Neumann and Thermodynamic Entropies.” European Physical Journal H 38:57–81.Google Scholar
Earman, J., and Norton, J.. 1998. “Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell’s Demon.” Pt. 1, “From Maxwell to Szilard.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29:435–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J., and Norton, J.. 1999. “Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell’s Demon.” Pt. 2, “From Szilard to Landauer and Beyond.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30:1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. 1914/1997. “Contributions to Quantum Theory.” In The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 6, The Berlin Years: Writings, 1914–1917, trans. Engel, Alfred, 20–26. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O.. 2006. “Von Neumann’s Entropy Does Not Correspond to Thermodynamic Entropy.” Philosophy of Science 73 (2): 153–74..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L. 2003. “The von Neumann Entropy: A Reply to Shenker.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2): 291–96..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. I. G. 1992. The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. 1957. “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics.” Physical Review 106 (4): 620–30..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. 1878. “Tait’s ‘Thermodynamics.’” Nature 17:257–59, 278–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrvold, W. 2011. “Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics: A Maxwellian View.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 42 (2): 237–43..Google Scholar
Norton, J. 2017. “Thermodynamically Reversible Processes in Statistical Physics.” American Journal of Physics 85 (135): 135–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, A. 1990. “Thermodynamic Constraints on Quantum Axioms.” In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information: The Proceedings of the Workshop on Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information Held May–June, 1989 in Santa Fe, New Mexico, ed. Zurek, W. H., 345–56. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity 8. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Peres, A.. 2002. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunkl, C. 2020. “On the Equivalence of Thermodynamic and von Neumann Entropy.” Philosophy of Science 87 (2): 262–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenker, O. 1999. “Is −kTr(ρ ln ρ) the Entropy in Quantum Mechanics?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. 1955. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar