Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:15:53.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Some Comments on Quine's Analysis of Simplicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Stuart Silvers
Stuart Silvers*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 59 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗∗

I should like to express my appreciation to Professor Nicholas Rescher for his useful suggestions.

References

[1] Goodman, N. Structure of Appearance (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951).Google Scholar
[2] Quine, W. V. Word and Object (New York: Technology Press and Wiley, 1960).Google Scholar
[3] Rudner, R. S. “An Introduction to Simplicity” in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 28: 109–119, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Rudner, R. S. “Some Problems of Sociological Theory”. A paper presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Section L, December 1961.Google Scholar