Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:22:57.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion Review: Laudan's Progress and its Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Ernan McMullin
Ernan McMullin*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , December 1979 , pp. 623 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Dr. Laudan who helped me eliminate some errors of interpretation and of historical detail from the first draft of the paper.

References

Kuhn, T. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1976), “The criterion of fertility and the unit for appraisal in science,” Essays in Honor of Imre Lakatos, R. Cohen et al. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel, 395–432.Google Scholar
Suppe, F. (1977), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, second edition.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Understanding. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar