Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:53:34.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Note on Tense and Subjunctive Conditionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Richmond H. Thomason
Richmond H. Thomason*
Affiliation:
Linguistics Department, University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 151 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harper, W.; Stalnaker, R.; and Pearce, G. (eds.) (1981), Ifs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Janssen, T. (1973), “Scope ambiguities of tense, aspect, and negation”, in Heny, F. and Richards, B. (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Nute, D. (1983), Review of Harper, Stalnaker, and Pearce (1981). Philosophy of Science 50: 518–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. (1973), “Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns”, Journal of Philosophy 79: 601–9.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1981), “A defense of conditional excluded middle”, in Harper, Stalnaker and Pearce, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Thomason, R., and Gupta, A. (1981), “A theory of conditionals in the context of branching time”, in Harper, Stalnaker and Pearce, pp. 299–322.Google Scholar