Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:24:01.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Moor and Schlesinger on Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brian Cupples*
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cupples, B. (1977), “Three Types of Explanation.Philosophy of Science 44: 387408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, R., Kaplan, D., and Montague, R. (1961), “Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.Philosophy of Science 28: 418428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C., and Oppenheim, P. (1965), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Reprinted in C. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 245295. Originally published 1945.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1961), “Explanation Revisited.Philosophy of Science 28: 429436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moor, J. (1976), “The Cancellation of Symmetrical Contraries and The Principle of Significant Contradictories.Philosophy of Science 43: 550559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1974), Confirmation and Confirmability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1978), “On a Matter of Principle.Philosophy of Science 45: 312317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar