Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:38:39.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: How to Reduce a Functional Psychology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Patricia Kitcher*
Affiliation:
University of Vermont

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I commented on Robert Richardson's “The Autonomy of Psychology: Putnam's Modest Proposal” (1978) at the Eastern Division Meetings of the A.P.A. in December of 1978. At the time he sent me that paper, Professor Richardson kindly included a copy of the longer paper, “Functionalism and Reductionism” (1979), of which the A.P.A. paper was a part. I am grateful to several people, particularly N. J. Block and Philip Kitcher, for encouraging me to expand my A. P.A. comments into a reply to Professor Richardson's larger project. I am also grateful to an anonymous referee for Philosophy of Science whose perceptive comments led me to clarify some key points.

References

Kitcher, P. (1978), “Two Versions of the Identity Theory,” unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. (1978), “The Autonomy of Psychology: Putnam's Modest Proposal.” Presented at the Eastern Division Meetings of the A.P.A. in December, 1978.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. (1979), “Functionalism and Reductionism,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 533558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar