No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Discussion (Correspondence)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Discussion (Correspondence)
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1935
References
1 See, for instance, as an illuminating essay in reconstructive historical criticism, Gauss' Werke, Bd. X2, pp. 93–105, especially p. 104, and the references there given.
You have
Access