No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Discussion (Correspondence)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0eb9/a0eb962c26235a5e309470a49f4eb77b890502d7" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Discussion (Correspondence)
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1935
References
1 See, for instance, as an illuminating essay in reconstructive historical criticism, Gauss' Werke, Bd. X2, pp. 93–105, especially p. 104, and the references there given.