Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:17:19.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dewey on Naturalism, Realism and Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Peter Godfrey-Smith
Peter Godfrey-Smith*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
Send reprint requests to: Peter Godfrey-Smith, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2155; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An interpretation of John Dewey's views about realism, science, and naturalistic philosophy is presented. Dewey should be seen as an unorthodox realist, with respect to both general metaphysical debates about realism and with respect to debates about the aims and achievements of science.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 69 , Issue S3 , September 2002 , pp. S25 - S35
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boisvert, Raymond (1988), Dewey’s Metaphysics. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael. (1991) Realism and Truth, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred (1995), Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John ([1922] 1988), Human Nature and Conduct. Reprinted in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John ([1929a] 1988), Experience and Nature, revised ed. Reprinted in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John ([1929b] 1988), The Quest for Certainty. Reprinted in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John ([1938] 1991), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Reprinted in Jo-Ann Boydston (ed.), John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1939), “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder”, in Schilpp, Paul A. and Hahn, Lewis E. (eds.), The Philosophy of John Dewey. (Library of Living Philosophers). La Salle: Open Court, 517–608.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1985), How We Think, and Selected Essays, 1910–1911, in Boydston, Jo-Ann (ed.), John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 6. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter T. (1972), Logic Matters. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (1996), Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter (forthcoming), “Dewey and the Question of Realism.”Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1978), Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1985), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1992), “The Naturalist’s Return”, The Naturalist’s Return 101:53–114.Google Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary (ed.) (1985), Naturalizing Epistemology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1939), “Dewey’s Theory of Science”, in Schilpp, Paul A. and Hahn, Lewis E. (eds.) The Philosophy of John Dewey. (Library of Living Philosophers). La Salle: Open Court, 159–192.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan (1995), John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steven (1988), Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Worrall, John (1989), “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43:99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar