Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:35:04.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Damn the Consequences: Projective Evidence and the Heterogeneity of Scientific Confirmation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

I contrast our own evidence for the hypothesis of organic fossil origins with that available in previous centuries, suggesting that the most powerful contemporary evidence consists in a form of projective support whose distinctive features are not well captured by familiar hypothetico-deductive, abductive, or even more recent and more technically sophisticated (e.g., Bayesian) accounts of scientific confirmation. I suggest that such accounts either misrepresent or ignore something important about the heterogeneous ways in which scientific hypotheses can be supported by evidence, and I go on to suggest that the search for any single such account may be misguided in any case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

It is a pleasure to acknowledge exceedingly useful discussions of this material with Jeff Barrett, Peter Lipton, Pen Maddy, Brian Skyrms, Bruce Glymour, Elliott Sober, Kevin Zollman, Gillian Barker, John Norton, Martin Thompson-Jones, Derek Turner, and others I have forgotten, as well as audiences at Oberlin, Pittsburgh's Center for History and Philosophy of Science, the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge University, the University of Konstanz, the University of California–San Diego, the 2009 Second Conference on Integrated History and Philosophy of Science at Notre Dame University, the 2009 conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association, the 2009 Unconceived Alternatives Symposium at the Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematical Physics and the Institute Vienna Circle, the 2010 Henle Conference, and the PSA 2010. This essay is dedicated to the memory of Peter Lipton, who always asked the right questions.

References

Briggs, D. E. G., and Kear, A.. 1993. “Fossilization of Soft Tissue in the Laboratory.” Science 259:1439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleland, C. E. 2002. “Methodological and Experimental Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science.” Philosophy of Science 69:447–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiGregorio, B. 2010. “Martian Sheen: Life on the Rocks.” New Scientist, no. 2747:4043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efremov, J. A. 1940. “Taphonomy: A New Branch of Paleontology.” Pan-American Geologist 74:8193.Google Scholar
Martin, D., Briggs, D. E. G., and Parkes, R. J.. 2003. “Experimental Mineralization of Invertebrate Eggs and the Preservation of Neoproterozoic Embryos.” Geology 31:39.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehler, J. H., and Schopf, J. W.. 1971. “Artificial Microfossils: Experimental Studies of Perminalization of Blue-Green Algae in Silica.” Science 174:1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raff, E., Villinski, C. J. T., Turner, F. R., Donoghue, P. C. J., and Raff, R. A.. 2006. “Experimental Taphonomy Shows the Feasibility of Fossil Embryos.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:5846–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1976. The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Paleontology. 2nd ed. New York: Science History.Google Scholar
Shipman, P. 1981. Life History of a Fossil: An Introduction to Taphonomy and Paleoecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. K.. 2011. “Getting Real: The Hypothesis of Organic Fossil Origins.” Special issue, Modern Schoolman 87 (March): 219–43.Google Scholar