Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T06:18:20.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Criticism of the Use of the Concept of “Dominant Group” in Arguments for Evolutionary Progressivem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Janet L. Travis
Janet L. Travis*
Affiliation:
University of Nevada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I criticize the particular argument for evolutionary progressivism which is based on the concept of a series of “dominant life forms.”

My procedure is to show that there is no rigorous definition for the concept of “dominant life form.”

I examine several attempts to define this concept by Julian Huxley and a new formulation of the concept by G. G. Simpson and show that none of the criteria either of these men develop for determining which groups of organisms can be classified as dominant are adequate to exclude any groups of organisms from the classification. The concept proves so broad as to be meaningless. Since it is a key concept in the particular argument for progressivism that I discuss, the criticism of the concept demonstrates the argument to be invalid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 1971 , pp. 369 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Goudge, T. A., The Ascent of Life, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1961.Google Scholar
[2] Huxley, J. S., Evolution: The Modern Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Science Editions, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[3] Simpson, G. G., The Meaning of Evolution (revised ed.), Yale University Press, New Haven, 1967.Google Scholar
[4] Wells, H. G., Huxley, J. S. and Wells, G. P., The Science of Life, The Literary Guild, New York, 1929.Google Scholar