Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:01:13.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Biological Mistake Theory and the Question of Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2024

David S. Oderberg
Affiliation:
Jonathan Hill
Affiliation:
Christopher Austin
Affiliation:
Ingo Bojak
Affiliation:
François Cinotti
Affiliation:
Jonathan M. Gibbins
Affiliation:
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The making of mistakes by organisms and other living systems is a theoretically and empirically unifying feature of biological investigation. Mistake theory is a rigorous and experimentally productive way of understanding this widespread phenomenon. It does, however, run up against the long-standing ‘functions’ debate in philosophy of biology. Against the objection that mistakes are just a kind of malfunction, and that without a position on functions there can be no theory of mistakes, we reply that this is to misunderstand the theory. In this paper we set out the basic concepts of mistake theory and then argue that mistakes are a distinctive phenomenon in their own right, not just a kind of malfunction.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association