Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:44:47.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Experimental Measure of Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

C. West Churchman
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Russell L. Ackoff
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Extract

The boundaries of psychology have never been very distinctly defined and, as a consequence, science has witnessed frequent border incidents. But it obviously is not psychology alone which suffers from such lack of delineation, but its neighbors, the biological and social sciences, do as well. Cooperation between sciences becomes difficult under these conditions. All agree that psychology is the science of mind, but few agree to what “mind” is. At least within our century “mind” has been taken to be “behavior”, for the present day outlook is that mind is behavior rather than that which is responsible for behavior (3). The metaphysical dynamism of a prime mover has been replaced by an experimental concept, i.e., one that is susceptible to scientific investigation. There is no need to review the complex history of behavioristic psychology in its many ramifications, ranging from Watson's mechanism to the various vitalistic teleologies. We turn instead to a fundamental problem on which there is little agreement: “What kind of behavior should be called mind?”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Singer, E. A. Jr., Experience and Reflection (in preparation).Google Scholar
2. Singer, E. A. Jr., “Mechanism, Vitalism, Naturalism”, Phil. of Sci., Vol. 13, No. 2, April, 1946, 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Singer, E. A. Jr., Mind as Behavior, R. G. Adams and Co., 1924.Google Scholar
4. Singer, E. A. Jr., “Philosophy of Experiment”, Symposium, I, 2.Google Scholar