We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Block, N., ed. (1980), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Volume 1. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, A. L. (1980), “Have species become déclassé?” Asquith, P. and Giere, R. (eds.), PSA 1980, vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Caplan, A.L. (1981), “Back to class: a note on the ontology of species”, Philosophy of Science, 48: 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1959), Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner, Language, 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1976), “Are species really individuals?” Systematic Zoology, 25: 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1978), “A matter of individuality”, Philosophy of Science, 45: 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1981), “Kitts and Kitts and Caplan on species”, Philosophy of Science, 48: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitts, D. B. and Kitts, D. J. (1979), “Biological species as natural kinds”, Philosophy of Science, 46: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980), “Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism”, Philosophy of Science, 47: 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar