Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:43:48.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Achinstein's Law and Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

James H. Fetzer*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion Review
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, P. Law and Explanation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Achinstein, P. Concepts of Science. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969. Pages 131132.Google Scholar
Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (eds.). The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969. Pages 259291.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. H.A Single Case Propensity Theory of Explanation.” Synthese 28 (1974): 171198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. H.The Likeness of Lawlikeness.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. XXXII. Edited by Michalos, A. and Cohen, R. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1975.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G.Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. III. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962. Pages 103110.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G.Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 35 (1968): 116133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971. Pages 42–43 and 106108.10.2307/j.ctt6wrd9pCrossRefGoogle Scholar