No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Achinstein's Law and Explanation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Discussion Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Achinstein, P. Law and Explanation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Achinstein, P. Concepts of Science. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969. Pages 131–132.Google Scholar
Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (eds.). The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969. Pages 259–291.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. H. “A Single Case Propensity Theory of Explanation.” Synthese 28 (1974): 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. H. “The Likeness of Lawlikeness.” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. XXXII. Edited by Michalos, A. and Cohen, R. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1975.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. “Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. III. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962. Pages 103–110.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. “Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 35 (1968): 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971. Pages 42–43 and 106–108.10.2307/j.ctt6wrd9pCrossRefGoogle Scholar