Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T01:51:43.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Dominik Hangleiter, Jacques Carolan, and Karim P. Y. Thébault’s Analogue Quantum Simulation: A New Instrument for Scientific Understanding - Dominik Hangleiter, Jacques Carolan, and Karim P. Y. Thébault, Analogue Quantum Simulation: A New Instrument for Scientific Understanding. Cham: Springer (2022), XI, 148 pp. £54.99 (hardback), £43.99 (ebook).

Review products

Dominik Hangleiter, Jacques Carolan, and Karim P. Y. Thébault, Analogue Quantum Simulation: A New Instrument for Scientific Understanding. Cham: Springer (2022), XI, 148 pp. £54.99 (hardback), £43.99 (ebook).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

Grace Field
Grace Field*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 229 - 232
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crowther, Karen, Linnemann, Niels, and Wüthrich, Christian. 2019. “What We Cannot Learn from Analogue Experiments.” Synthese (May). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02190-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dardashti, Radin, Hartmann, Stephan, Thébault, Karim, and Winsberg, Eric. 2019. “Hawking Radiation and Analogue Experiments: A Bayesian Analysis.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67 (August):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dardashti, Radin, Thébault, Karim P. Y., and Winsberg, Eric. 2017. “Confirmation via Analogue Simulation: What Dumb Holes Could Tell Us about Gravity.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68:55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. W., and Thébault, K. P. Y.. 2020a. “On the Limits of Experimental Knowledge.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 (20190235).Google ScholarPubMed
Evans, Peter W., and Thébault, Karim P. Y.. 2020b. “What Can Bouncing Oil Droplets Tell Us about Quantum Mechanics?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (39). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00301-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Grace E. 2021a. “Putting Theory in Its Place: The Relationship between Universality Arguments and Empirical Constraints.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (November). https://doi.org/10.1086/718276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Grace E. 2021b. “The Latest Frontier in Analogue Gravity: New Roles for Analogue Experiments” (June). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20365/.Google Scholar
Hangleiter, Dominik, Corolan, Jacques, and Thébault, Karim P. Y.. 2022. Analogue Quantum Simulation: A New Instrument for Scientific Understanding. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, M. J., Weinfurtner, S., and König, F.. 2020. “The Next Generation of Analogue Gravity Experiments.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 (2177).Google ScholarPubMed
Reutlinger, A., Hangleiter, D., and Hartmann, S.. 2018. “Understanding (with) toy models.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (4):1069–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thébault, Karim. 2019. “What Can We Learn from Analogue Experiments?” In Why Trust a Theory? Epistemology of Fundamental Physics, edited by Dardashti, Radin, Dawid, Richard, and Thébault, Karim, 184–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar