Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:31.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Renormalization and the Formulation of Scientific Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

James D. Fraser
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Providing a precise statement of their position has long been a central challenge facing scientific realists. This article draws some morals about how realism ought to be formulated from the renormalization group framework in high-energy physics.

Type
Physics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 5 , December 2018 , pp. 1164 - 1175
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Doreen Fraser and Laura Ruetsche for inviting me to participate in the symposium and to Steven French, Porter Williams, and Laura Ruetsche (again) for useful discussions of previous versions of this material.

References

Barrett, Jeffrey A. 2008. “Approximate Truth and Descriptive Nesting.” Erkenntnis 68 (2): 213–24..10.1007/s10670-007-9086-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Antony. 2012. The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Doreen. 2011. “How to Take Particle Physics Seriously: A Further Defence of Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42:126–35.10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, James D. Forthcoming. “Towards a Realist View of Quantum Field Theory.” In Scientific Realism and the Quantum, ed. Steven French and Juha Saatis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James. 2010. “In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism.” In Scientific Structuralism, ed. Bokulich, Alisa and Bokulich, Peter. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Magnus, P. D., and Callender, Craig. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71 (3): 320–38..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, David B. 2012. Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226502472.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polchinski, Joseph. 1984. “Renormalization and Effective Lagrangians.” Nuclear Physics B 231 (2): 269–95..Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander. 1990. “Independence from Future Theories: A Research Strategy in Quantum Theory.” In PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, ed. A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, 203–11. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, Laura. 2018. “Renormalization Group Realism: The Ascent of Pessimism.” Philosophy of Science, in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saatsi, Juha. 2009. “Form vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Science, ed. Magnus, P. and Busch, J., 8–28. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saatsi, Juha. 2016. “What Is Theoretical Progress of Science?” Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1118-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saatsi, Juha. 2017. “Replacing Recipe Realism.” Synthese 194 (5): 3233–44..10.1007/s11229-015-0962-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2003. “Pyrrhic Victories for Scientific Realism.” Journal of Philosophy 100 (11): 553–72..Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David. 2006. “In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory.” Synthese 151:33–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David 2011. “Taking Particle Physics Seriously: A Critique of the Algebraic Approach to Quantum Field Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42:116–25.10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Porter. 2017. “Scientific Realism Made Effective.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kenneth G., and Kogut, J.. 1974. “The Renormalization Group and the ϵ Expansion.” Physics Reports 12 (2): 75–199..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, John. 1989. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43 (1–2): 99–124.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar