Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:57:09.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuroscience and the Multiple Realization of Cognitive Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Carrie Figdor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many empirically minded philosophers have used neuroscientific data to argue against the multiple realization of cognitive functions in existing biological organisms. I argue that neuroscientists themselves have proposed a biologically based concept of multiple realization as an alternative to interpreting empirical findings in terms of one-to-one structure-function mappings. I introduce this concept and its associated research framework and also how some of the main neuroscience-based arguments against multiple realization go wrong.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 419 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I wish to thank Jennifer Mundale, John Bickle, and the audience at the 2003 Society for Philosophy and Psychology annual meeting for comments on a distant ancestor of this paper; at least two anonymous reviewers at Philosophy of Science; Tom Polger and other members of the October 2008 Workshop on Multiple Realization at the University of Cincinnati, including Ken Aizawa, John Bickle, Carl Craver, Carl Gillett, Larry Shapiro, and Jacqueline Sullivan; and my colleagues in the Philosophy Department and the Program in Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Iowa.

References

Aizawa, Kenneth, and Gillett, Carl. 2009. “Levels, Individual Variation, and Massive Multiple Realization in Neurobiology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience, ed. Bickle, John, 539–81. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kristin. 2008. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, s.v. “Animal Cognition,” http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar
Attwell, David, and Iadecola, Costantino. 2002. “The Neural Basis of Functional Brain Imaging Signals.” Trends in Neurosciences 25 (12): 621–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, William. 2006. “Critical Notice: The Mind Incarnate.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2): 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William, and Mundale, Jennifer. 1999. “Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States.” Philosophy of Science 66:175–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickle, John. 1998. Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bickle, John. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned J., and Fodor, Jerry A. 1972. “What Psychological States Are Not.” Philosophical Review 8 (2): 159–81.Google Scholar
Broca, Paul. 1861/1960/2001. “Remarques Sur le Siege de la Faculte du Langage Articule; Survies d’une Observation d’Aphemie.” Bulletin de la Societe Anatomique 6:330–57. Trans. G. von Bonin. 1960. “Remarks on the Seat of the Faculty of Articulate Language, Followed by an Observation of Aphemia.” In Some Papers on the Cerebral Cortex, ed. Bonin, G. von, 49–72. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Repr. in Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader, ed. Bechtel, William, Mandik, Pete, Mundale, Jennifer, and Stufflebeam, Robert, 87–99. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brodmann, Korbinian. 1909/1994. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig: Barth. Trans. L. J. Garey. 1994. Brodmann's Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex. London: Smith-Gordon.Google Scholar
Burton, H. 2003. “Visual Cortex Activity in Early and Late Blind People.” Journal of Neuroscience 23 (10): 4005–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, Alfonso. 1986. “On Drawing Inferences about the Structure of Normal Cognitive Systems from the Analysis of Patterns of Impaired Performance: The Case for Single-Patient Studies.” Brain and Cognition 5:41–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, Peter. 2006. The Architecture of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Patricia. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 78 (2): 67–90.Google Scholar
Clapp, Leonard. 2001. “Disjunctive Properties: Multiple Realizations.” Journal of Philosophy 98 (3): 111–36.Google Scholar
Coltheart, Max. 2004. “Brain Imaging, Connectionism, and Cognitive Neuropsychology.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 21 (1): 21–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, Max, and Davies, Martin. 2003. “Inference and Explanation in Cognitive Neuropsychology.” Cortex 39:188–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couch, Mark B. 2004. “Discussion: A Defense of Bechtel and Mundale.” Philosophy of Science 71:198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, Terrence. 2004. “Monkey Homologues of Human Language Areas: Computing the Ambiguities.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7): 288–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dronkers, Nina F., Redfern, Brenda B., and Knight, Robert T. 2000. “The Neural Architecture of Language Disorders.” In The New Cognitive Neurosciences, ed. Gazzaniga, Michael, 949–58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John C., and Kirsner, Kim. 2003. “What Can We Infer from Double Dissociations?” Cortex 39:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelman, Gerald M., and Gally, Joseph A. 2001. “Degeneracy and Complexity in Biological Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98 (24): 13763–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, Martha J. 1994. “Neuropsychological Inference with an Interactive Brain: A Critique of the ‘Locality' Assumption.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1): 43–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felleman, Daniel J., and Van Essen, David C. 1987. “Distributed Hierarchical Processing in the Primate Cerebral Cortex.” Cerebral Cortex 1:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felleman, Daniel J., and Van Essen, David C. 1991a. “Distributed Hierarchical Processing in the Primate Cerebral Cortex.” Cerebral Cortex 1:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felleman, Daniel J., and Van Essen, David C. 1991b. “Receptive Field Properties of Neurons in Area V3 of Macaque Monkey Extrastriate Cortex.” Journal of Neurophysiology 57:889–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Hartry. 1973. “Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70:462–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1974/1975. “Special Sciences; or, The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Synthese 28:97–115. Rev. and repr. in The Language of Thought, 9–26. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 2000. “Special Sciences: Still Autonomous after All These Years; A Reply to Jaegwon Kim's ‘Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction.'” In Critical Condition, 9–24. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Repr. from Philosophical Perspectives 11: Mind, Causation, and World, ed. Tomberlin, J. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, Karl. 1997. “Imaging Cognitive Anatomy.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, Karl. 2002. “Beyond Phrenology: What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us about Distributed Circuitry?” Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:221–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, Karl, and Price, Cathy. 2003. “Degeneracy and Redundancy in Cognitive Anatomy.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (4): 151–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, Carl. 2003. “The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 100 (11): 591–603.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. 1961. “The Brain as an Engineering Problem.” In Current Problems in Animal Behaviour, ed. Thorpe, W. H. and Zangwill, O. L., 307–30. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Santi, Andrea. 2008. “The Battle for Broca's Region.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (12): 474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagmann, Patric, Cammoun, Leila, Gigandet, Xavier, Meuli, Reto, Honey, Christopher J., Wedeen, Van J., and Sporns, Olaf. 2008. “Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex.” Public Library of Science (PLoS) Biology 6 (7): 1–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Haxby, James V., Grady, Cheryl I., Horwitz, Barry, Underleider, Leslie G., Mishkin, Mortimer, Carson, Richard E., Herscovitch, Peter, Schapiro, Mark B., and Rapoport, Stanley I. 1991. “Dissociation of Object and Spatial Visual Processing Pathways in Human Extrastriate Cortex.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88 (5): 1621–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henson, Richard. 2005. “What Can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A (2): 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Janine M., McIntosh, Anthony R., Kapur, Shitij, Tulving, Endel, and Houle, Sylvain. 1997. “Cognitive Subtractions May Not Add Up: The Interaction between Semantic Processing and Response Mode.” Neuroimage 5:229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Adam, Fenton, Andre A., Kentros, Cliff, and Redish, A. David. 2009. “Looking for Cognition in the Structure within the Noise.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (2): 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanwisher, Nancy, McDermott, Josh, and Chun, Marvin. 1997. “The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception.” Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1): 4302–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kary, Michael, and Mahner, Martin. 2002. “How Would You Know if You Synthesized a Thinking Thing?” Minds and Machines 12:61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, Brian L. 2000. “Shocking Lessons from Electric Fish: The Theory and Practice of Multiple Realization.” Philosophy of Science 67:444–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, Brian L. 2002. “Making Sense of the Senses: Individuating Modalities in Humans and Other Animals.” Journal of Philosophy 99 (1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. 1993. “Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction.” In Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays, 309–35. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. 2006. Philosophy of Mind. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Westview.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungsu. 2002. “Testing Multiple Realizability: A Discussion of Bechtel and Mundale.” Philosophy of Science 69:606–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, Stephen M. 1999. “If Neuroimaging Is the Answer, What Is the Question?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 354 (1387): 1283–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, Stephen M., Alpert, Nathaniel M., Thompson, William L., Chabris, Christopher F., Rauch, Scott L., and Anderson, Adam K. 1994. “Identifying Objects Seen from Different Viewpoints: A PET Investigation.” Brain 117:1055–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, Stephen M., DiGirolamo, Gregory J., Thompson, William L., and Alpert, Nathaniel M. 1998. “Mental Rotation of Objects versus Hands: Neural Mechanisms Revealed by Positron Emission Tomography.” Psychophysiology 35:151–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lashley, Karl S. 1929. Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lashley, Karl S. 1950. “In Search of the Engram.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 4:454–82.Google Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph E. 2000. “Emotion Circuits in the Brain.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 23:155–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, Robin. 2000. “Space and the Chiral Molecule.” In Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, ed. Bhushan, Nalini and Rosenfeld, Stuart, 129–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, John C., and Fink, Gereon R. 2003. “Cerebral Localization, Then and Now.” NeuroImage 20:S2–S7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundale, Jennifer. 2002. “Concepts of Localization: Balkanization in the Brain.” Brain and Mind 3:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noppeney, Uta, Friston, Karl, and Price, Cathy. 2004. “Degenerate Neuronal Systems Sustaining Cognitive Functions.” Journal of Anatomy 205:433–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orban, Guy A., Essen, David Van, and Vanduffel, Wim. 2004. “Comparative Mapping of Higher Visual Areas in Monkeys and Humans.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7): 315–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachella, Robert G. 1974. “The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research.” In Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition, ed. Kantowitz, Barry H., 41–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. G., Zeki, S., and Barlow, H. B. 1984. “Localization of Function in the Cerebral Cortex: Past, Present and Future.” Brain 104 (1): 328–61.Google Scholar
Plaut, David C. 1995. “Double Dissociation without Modularity: Evidence from Connectionist Neuropsychology.” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 17 (2): 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polger, Thomas. 2004. Natural Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Cathy J., and Friston, Karl J. 1997. “Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments.” NeuroImage 5:261–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, Cathy J., and Friston, Karl J. 2002. “Degeneracy and Cognitive Anatomy.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (10): 416–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, Cathy J., and Friston, Karl J. 2005. “Functional Ontologies for Cognition: The Systematic Definition of Structure and Function.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3): 262–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, Hilary. 1967. “The Nature of Mental States.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 429–40. New York: Cambridge University Press. Repr. “Psychological Predicates.” In Art, Mind and Religion, ed. Capitan, W. H. and Merrill, Daniel D., 37–48. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “Philosophy and Our Mental Life.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 291–303. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raichle, Marcus E., Fiez, Julie E., Videen, Tom O., MacLeod, Ann-Mary K., Pardo, Jose V., Fox, Peter T., and Petersen, Steven E. 1994. “Practice-Related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning.” Cerebral Cortex 4 (1): 8–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savoy, Robert L. 2001. “History and Future Directions of Human Brain Mapping and Functional Neuroimaging.” Acta Psychologica 107:9–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, Eric L., ed. 1990. Computational Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shallice, Tim. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2000. “Multiple Realizations.” Journal of Philosophy 97 (12): 635–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Saul. 1969. “The Discovery of Processing Stages: Extensions of Donders’ Method.” Acta Psychologica 30:276–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talairach, J., and Tournoux, P. 1988. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical.Google Scholar
Tononi, Giulio, Sporns, Olaf, and Edelman, Gerald M. 1999. “Measures of Degeneracy and Redundancy in Biological Networks.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:3257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tootell, Roger B. H., Mendola, Janine D., Hadjikhani, Nouchine K., Ledden, Partick J., Liu, Arthur K., Reppas, John B., Sereno, Martin I., and Dale, Anders M. 1997. “Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex.” Journal of Neuroscience 17 (18): 7060–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tootell, Roger B. H., Tsao, Doris, and Vanduffel, Wim. 2003. “Neuroimaging Weighs In: Humans Meet Macaques in ‘Primate' Visual Cortex.” Journal of Neuroscience 23 (10): 3981–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungerleider, Leslie, Courtney, Susan, and Haxby, James V. 1998. “A Neural System for Human Visual Working Memory.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:883–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungerleider, Leslie, and Mishkin, Mortimer. 1982. “Two Cortical Visual Systems.” In Analysis of Visual Behavior, ed. Ingle, David J., Goodale, Melvyn A., and Mansfield, Richard J. W., 549–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. 1998. Toward a New Behaviorism: The Case against Perceptual Reductionism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Uttal, William R. 2001. The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vanduffel, W., Fize, D., Mandeville, J. B., Nelissen, K., Hecke, P. Van, Rosen, B. R., Tootell, R. B., and Orban, G. A. 2001. “Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys.” Neuron 32:565–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanduffel, W., Fize, D., Peuskens, H., Denys, K., Sunaert, S., Todd, J. T., and Orban, G. A. 2002. “Extracting 3D from Motion: Differences in Human and Monkey Intraparietal Cortex.” Science, n.s., 298 (5592): 413–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Melchner, Laurie, Pallas, Sarah, and Sur, Mrisanka. 2000. “Visual Behaviour Mediated by Retinal Projections Directed to the Auditory Pathway.” Nature 404:871–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, Jamie. 2006. The Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. Hove: Psychology.Google Scholar