Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T20:44:43.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don't Know Much about Art…but I Know It Involves Isomorphism)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Steven French
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Discussions of representation in science tend to draw on examples from art. However, such examples need to be handled with care given a) the differences between works of art and scientific theories and b) the accommodation of these examples within certain philosophies of art. I shall examine the claim that isomorphism is neither necessary nor sufficient for representation and I shall argue that there exist accounts of representation in both art and science involving isomorphism which accommodate the apparent counterexamples and, moreover, allow us to understand how “impossible” artistic objects and inconsistent scientific theories can be said to represent.

Type
Models and Modeling
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 1472 - 1483
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I am grateful to a number of people for discussions on this topic, including Otávio Bueno, Matthew Kieran, James Ladyman, and Mauricio Suarez but most especially Alirio Rosales and the MA students who took my “Issues in Philosophy of Science” module. Of course, I should take the blame for any artistic misjudgments or philosophical infelicities.

References

Budd, Malcolm (1993), “How Pictures Look”, in Virtue and Taste, D. Knowles and J. Skorupski (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 154–175.Google Scholar
Bueno, Otávio (1997), “Empirical Adequacy: A Partial Structures Approach”, Empirical Adequacy: A Partial Structures Approach 28:585–610.Google Scholar
da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven (1990), “The Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science”, The Model-Theoretic Approach in the Philosophy of Science 57:248–265.Google Scholar
da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven (forthcoming), Partial Structures and Partial Truth: A Unitary Account of Scientific Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (1997), “Superconductivity and Structures: Revisiting the London Account”, Superconductivity and Structures: Revisiting the London Account 28:363–393.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (1998), “A Semantic Perspective on Idealization in Quantum Mechanics”, in Idealization VIII: Idealization in Contemporary Physics: Pozna'n Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, N. Shanks (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodolpi, 51–73.Google Scholar
French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (1999), “Reinflating the Semantic Approach”, Reinflating the Semantic Approach 13:99–117.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1969), Languages of Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin (1999), “Theories and Models: the Interactive View”, in Visual Representations and Interpretations, R. Paton and I. Neilson (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.I.G. (1997), “Models and Representation”, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S325–S336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laymon, Raymond (1988), “The Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Appraisal of Theories”, in Scrutinizing Science, Donovan, A. et al. (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pais, Abraham (1991), Niels Bohr's Times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, Mauricio (1999), “Theories, Models and Representations”, in Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1994), “Interpretation of Science: Science as Interpretation”, in Physics and Our View of the World, J. Hilgevoord (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar