Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:09:39.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Metaphysical Matrix of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Peter A. Carmichael
Peter A. Carmichael*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Introduction. Nowadays metaphysics is so far out of fashion, with scientists at any rate, that a few words of justification may be required for putting it in relation with science, as in this paper.

Metaphysics is nothing occult, nor is it necessarily dogmatic or allied to theology. Strictly, it is a science itself, the science of being. But since a large section of being—even the whole of it, according to some metaphysics—consists of phenomena, and since the ostensible business of natural science is with phenomena, a distinction has to be made. The use of ‘metaphysics’ in this paper is restricted to the non-phenomenal mode of being. More explicitly, it is restricted to formal and general things, such as category, class, variable, relation, order. General words, which I take to be all the words except certain proper names, are, accordingly, metaphysical signs; and the metaphysical matrix is by no means limited to science but extends to all discourse in which there are general terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 208 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 1953, The Williams & Wilkins Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Buchdahl, G., “Induction and Scientific Method,” Mind, LX, January, 1951.10.1093/mind/LX.237.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Carnap, Rudolf, Logical Syntax of Language. London, 1949.Google Scholar
(3) Krikorian, Yervant H., Ed., Naturalism and the Human Spirit. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.10.7312/krik90018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Robertson, J. K. as quoted in G. H. Ettinger's “Annual Meeting of the Royal Society of Canada,” Science, CII, July 20, 1945.Google Scholar
(5) Whetham, W. C. Dampier, Foundations of Science. London.Google Scholar
(6) Whitehead, Alfred North, Science and the Modern World. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1925.Google Scholar