Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T20:46:12.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Existential Hypotheses

Realistic versus Phenomenalistic Interpretations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Herbert Feigl
Herbert Feigl*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The intention of the present essay is to urge a reconsideration of the Realism-Phenomenalism-Issue, mainly and primarily in regard to the interpretation of scientific hypotheses; secondarily also relating to the basic problems of epistemology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1950 , pp. 35 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

1. Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth and Logic, Oxford Univ. Press, 1936; 2nd ed., Gollancz, London, 1946.Google Scholar
2. Ayer, A. J., The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge, The Macmillan Co., N. Y., 1940.Google Scholar
3. Ayer, A. J., “Other Minds,” Aristol. Soc. Suppl. Vol. 20, 1946.Google Scholar
4. Ayer, A. J., “Phenomenalism,” Proc. Aristol. Soc. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Barrett, W., “On the Existence of an External World,” Jl. of Phil., 36, 1939.Google Scholar
6. Bavink, B., The Natural Sciences, Century, N. Y., 1932.Google Scholar
7. Benjamin, A. C., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, The Macmillan Co., N. Y., 1937.Google Scholar
8. Bergmann, G., “Outline of an Empiricist Philosophy of Physics,” Am. Jl. of Phys. II, 1943.Google Scholar
9. Bergmann, G., “Remarks on Realism,” Phil. of Science 13, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bergmann, G., “The Logic of Quanta,” Am. Jl. of Phys. 15, 1947.Google Scholar
11. Black, M., “Linguistic Method in Philosophy,” Philos. & Phenon. Res. 8, 1948.Google Scholar
12. Braithwaite, R. B., “Propositions About Material Objects,” Proc. Aristol. Soc. 38, 1937-38.Google Scholar
13. Broad, C. D., Perception, Physics and Reality, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1914.Google Scholar
14. Broad, C. D., Scientific Thought, Harcourt-Brace & Co., N. Y., 1923.Google Scholar
15. Broad, C. D., The Mind and its Place in Nature, Harcourt-Brace & Co., N. Y., 1929.Google Scholar
16. Bures, C. E., “Operationism, Construction and Inference,” Jl. of Phil. 37, 1940.Google Scholar
17. Campbell, N. R., Physics: The Elements, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1921.Google Scholar
18. Carnap, R., Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, Berlin, 1928.Google Scholar
19. Carnap, R., Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie, Berlin, 1928.Google Scholar
20. Carnap, R., “The Foundations of Logic and Mathematics,” Int. Encyclop of Unif. Science, Vol. I, 3, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
21. Carnap, R., “Über die Aufgabe der Physik,” Kantstudien 28, 1923.Google Scholar
22. Carnap, R., “Testability and Meaning,” Philos. of Sci. 3–4, 1936-37.Google Scholar
23. Carnap, R., “The Two Concepts of Probability,” Philos. and Phenom. Res. 5, 1945 (Also reprinted in: H. Feigl & W. Sellars, Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, N. Y., 1949).Google Scholar
24. Chisholm, R. M., “The Contrary-to-Fact-Conditional,” Mind 55, 1946 (Also reprinted in: H. Feigl & W. Sellars, loc. cit.).Google Scholar
25. Churchman, C. W., Theory of Experimental Inference, The Macmillan Co., 1948.Google Scholar
26. Collingwood, R. G., An Essay on Metaphysics, Oxford Univ. Press, 1940.Google Scholar
27. Dingle, H., Science and Human Experience, The Macmillan Co., N. Y., 1932.Google Scholar
28. Ducasse, C. J., “On the Method of Knowledge in Philosophy,” Cal. Publ. in Philos. 16, 1945.Google Scholar
29. Einstein, A., “Physics and Reality,” Jl. of the Franklin Institute 221, 1936.Google Scholar
30. Feigl, H., Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik, G. Braun, Karlsruhe, 1929.Google Scholar
30a. Feigl, H. & Blumberg, A. E., “Logical Positivism,” Jl. of Phil. 28, 1931.Google Scholar
31. Feigl, H., “Logical Analysis of the Psychophysical Problem,” Philos. of Science I, 1934.Google Scholar
32. Feigl, H., “Sense and Nonsense in Scientific Realism,” Actes du Congres International de Philos. Scientifique, Paris, 1936.Google Scholar
32a. Feigl, H., “Logical Empiricism in: Twentieth Century Philosophy, ed. by D. D. Runes, Philos. library, N. Y., 1943.Google Scholar
33. Feigl, H., “Operationism and Scientific Method,” Psychol. Review 52, 1945. (Also reprinted in: H. Feigl & W. Sellars, Readings).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Feigl, H., “De Principiis non Disputandum—? An Essay on the Meaning and the Limits of Justification,” forthcoming.Google Scholar
35. Feigl, H. & Sellars, W., Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, N. Y., 1949.Google Scholar
36. Frank, Phil., Between Physics and Philosophy, Harvard Univ. Press, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Goodman, N., “The Problem on Counterfactual Conditionals,” Jl. of Philos. 44, 1947.Google Scholar
38. Hardie, C. D., “Our Knowledge of Other Minds,” Phil. of Science 6, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Hempel, C. G., “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” Mind 54, 1945.Google Scholar
40. Hempel, C. G., & Openheim, P., “Studies in the Logic of Explanation,” Phil. of Science, 15, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Kaufmann, F., Methodology of the Social Sciences, Oxford Univ. Press, N. Y. 1944.Google Scholar
42. Lenzen, V. F., “The Hypothesis of Dualism,” Philos. of Science 6, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Lenzen, V. F., “The Concept of Reality in Physical Theory,” Philos. Review 18, 1945.Google Scholar
44. Lewis, C. I., Mind and the World Order, Charles Scribner's Sons, N. Y., 1929.Google Scholar
45. Lewis, C. I., An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, Open Court Publ. Co., LaSalle, III., 1946.Google Scholar
46. Lewis, C. I., “Experience and Meaning,” Philos. Review 43, 1934 (also reprinted in Feigl, H. & Sellars, W., Readings).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Lovejoy, A. O., The Revolt against Dualism, W. W. Norton & Co., N. Y., 1930.Google Scholar
48. MacCorquodale, K. & Meehl, P. E., “On a Distinction Between Hypothetical Constructs and Intervening Variables,” Psychol. Review 55, 1948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Nagel, E., “Probability and the Theory of Knowledge?” Philos. of Science 6, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Nagel, E., “Sovereign Reason,” in: Freedom and Experience, essays presented to H. M. Kallen, ed. by S. Hook & M. R. Konvitz, Cornell Univ. Press, 1948.Google Scholar
51. Nelson, E. J., “The Inductive Argument for an External World,” Philos. of Science 3, 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Pap, A., The A Priori in Physical Theory, King's Crown Press, N. Y., 1946.Google Scholar
52a. Popper, K. R., “A Note on Natural Laws and so-called ”Contrary-to-fact-conditionals,“ Mind 58, 1949.Google Scholar
53. Ramsperger, A. G., Philosophies of Science, Crofts & Co., N. Y., 1942.Google Scholar
54. Reichenbach, H., Experience and Prediction, Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
55. Reichenbach, H., Philosophie Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Univ. of California Press, 1944.Google Scholar
56. Reichenbach, H., Elements of Symbolic Logic, The Macmillan Co., N. Y., 1947.Google Scholar
57. Reichenbach, H., “Rationalism and Empiricism,” in Philos. Review 57, 1948.Google Scholar
58. Russell, B., Our Knowledge of the External World, 2nd ed., W. W. Norton & Co., N. Y., 1929.Google Scholar
59. Russell, B., Mysticism and Logic, Ibid., 1929.Google Scholar
59a. Russell, B., Human Knowledge, Simon & Silvester, N. Y., 1948.Google Scholar
60. Russell, B., An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Ibid., 1940.Google Scholar
61. Rynin, D., “Probability and Meaning,” Jl. of Philos. 44, 1947.Google Scholar
62. Schlick, M., Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63. Schlick, M., Gesammelte Aufsatze, Gerold, Vienna, 1938.Google Scholar
64. Sellars, W., “Pure Pragmatics and Epistemology,” Philos. of Science 14, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Sellars, W., “Epistemology and the New Way of Words,” Jl. of Philos. 44, 1947.Google Scholar
66. Sellars, W., “Realism and the New Way of Words,” Philos. & Phenom. Res. 8, 1948. (Also reprinted in H. Feigl & W. Sellars, Readings).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. Sellars, W., “Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without them,” Philos. of Science 15, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. Stace, W. T., Theory of Knowledge and Existence, Oxford University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
69. Stace, W. T., “Refutation of Realism,” Mind 43, 1934.Google Scholar
70. Stace, W. T., “Positivism,” Mind 54, 1945.Google Scholar
71. Williams, D. C., “The Argument for Realism,” The Monist 1933-34.Google Scholar
72. Wisdom, J. O., The Metamorphosis of Philosophy, Al-Maaref Press, Cairo, 1947.Google Scholar