Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:27:06.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolution of Altruism: The Sober/Wilson Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

In what follows, I critique the interpretation that Sober and Wilson offer of their group selection model in Unto Others. Sober and Wilson mistakenly claim that their model operates as an example of Simpson's paradox and defend an interpretation of their model according to which groups are operated upon by natural selection. In the place of their interpretation, I offer one that parallels the mathematical calculation of the model's outcome and does not depend on the postulation of a force of group selection or a value for group fitness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to David Hull and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Cartwright, Nancy (1979), “Causal Laws and Effective Strategies”, Causal Laws and Effective Strategies 13:419437.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eells, Ellery (1991), Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesslow, Germund (1976), “Discussion: Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality”, Discussion: Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality 43:290292.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David Sloan (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, George (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar