Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:09:45.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Reply to Ackermann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Howard Kahane
Howard Kahane*
Affiliation:
The University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Permit me to reply to the recent note [1] in this journal by Robert J. Ackermann, concerning my critical comments (in [4]) on Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1967 , pp. 184 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Ackermann, Robert J., “Projecting Unprojectibles”, Philosophy of Science, 33, 1966, pp. 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (1st ed.), Cambridge, 1955.Google Scholar
[3] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (2nd ed.), Indianapolis, 1965.Google Scholar
[4] Kahane, Howard, “Nelson Goodman's Entrenchment Theory”, Philosophy of Science, 32, 1965, pp. 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar