Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:28:53.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Philosophy Disguised as Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

John W. Copeland*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Alston, William, “Are Positivists Metaphysicians ?Philosophical Review, 63 (1954), pp. 4357.10.2307/2182114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Copeland, Morris A.Economic Theory and the Natural Science Point of View.American Economic Review, 21 (1931), pp. 6779.Google Scholar
[3] Hochberg, Herbert, “Intervening Variables, Hypothetical Constructs and Metaphysics.” H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, eds. Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York, 1961. Pp. 448457.Google Scholar
[4] Peters, R. S. & Tajfel, H., “Hobbes and Hull - Metaphysicians of Behaviour.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 8 (1957–1958), pp. 3044.10.1093/bjps/VIII.29.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Skinner, B. F., “The Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms.Psychological Review, 52 (1945), pp. 270277 & pp. 291294.10.1037/h0062535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Skinner, B. F., Science and Human Behavior. New York, 1953.Google Scholar
[7] Skinner, B. F., “Freedom and the Control of Men,” American Scholar, 25 (1955–1956), pp. 4765.Google Scholar
[8] Skinner, B. F., Verbal Behavior. New York, 1957.10.1037/11256-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Skinner, B. F., Cumulative Record. New York, 1959.Google Scholar