Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:25:17.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deception and the Evolution of Plasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Rory Smead
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent models using simple signaling games provide a theoretical setting for investigating the evolutionary connection between signaling and behavioral plasticity. These models have shown that plasticity is typically eliminated in common-interest signaling games. In many real cases of signaling, however, interests do not align. Here, I present a model of the evolution of plasticity in signaling games and consider games of common, opposed, and partially aligned interests. I find that the setting of partial common interest is most conducive to the evolution of plasticity. Plastic individuals succeed by learning when to deceive others and when to trust others’ signals.

Type
Signaling Theory in Biological and Cognitive Sciences
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 81 , Issue 5 , December 2014 , pp. 852 - 865
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beggs, Alan W. 2005. “On the Convergence of Reinforcement Learning.” Journal of Economic Theory 122:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Richard W., and Bates, Lucy A.. 2007. “Sociality, Evolution and Cognition.” Current Biology 17:R714–R723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, In-Koo, and Kreps, David M.. 1987. “Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Frédérique, Morand-Ferron, Julie, and Giraldeau, Luc-Alain. 2010. “Learning in a Game Context: Strategy Choice by Some Keeps Learning from Evolving in Others.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 277:3609–16.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2012. Review of Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information, by Brian Skyrms. Mind 120:1288–97.Google Scholar
Harley, Calvin B. 1981. “Learning the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 89:611–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrnstein, Richard J. 1970. “On the Law of Effect.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 15:245–66.Google Scholar
Hofbauer, Josef, and Sigmund, Karl. 1998. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Nicholas K. 1976. “The Social Function of Intellect.” In Growing Points in Ethology, ed. Bateson, P. P. G. and Hinde, R. A., chap. 9, 303–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huttegger, Simon M., and Zollman, Kevin J. S.. 2010. “Dynamic Stability and Basins of Attraction in the Sir Philip Sidney Game.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 277:1915–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Huttegger, Simon M., and Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2011. “Signaling Games: The Dynamics of Evolution and Learning.” In Language, Games, and Evolution, ed. Benz, Anton, Ebert, Christian, Jäger, Gerhard, and van Rooij, Robert. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Katsnelson, Edith, Motro, Uzi, Feldman, Marcus W., and Lotem, Arnon. 2012. “Evolution of Learned Strategy Choice in a Frequency-Dependent Game.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 279:1176–84.Google Scholar
Korkut, Anil, and Hendrickson, Wayne A.. 2012. “Structural Plasticity and Conformational Transitions of HIV Envelope Glycoprotein gp120.” PLoS ONE 7, e52170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnamoorthy, Lakshmi, Bess, Julian W., Preston, Alex B., Nagashima, Kunio, and Mahal, Lara K.. 2009. “Hiv-1 and Microvesicles from T Cells Share a Common Glycome, Arguing for a Common Origin.” Nature Chemical Biology 5:244–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, John. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, John, and Harper, David. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ristau, Carolyn A. 1991. “Aspects of the Cognitive Ethology of an Injury-Feigning Bird, the Piping Plover.” In Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals, ed. Ristau, Carolyn A., chap. 5, 91–126. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., and Erev, Ido. 1995. “Learning in Extensive Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamical Models in the Intermediate Term.” Games and Economic Behavior 8:164–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, William A., and Nowicki, Stephen. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and the Flow of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smead, Rory. 2012. “Game Theoretic Equilibria and the Evolution of Learning.” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 24:301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smead, Rory 2014. “The Role of Social Interaction in the Evolution of Learning.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, published online March 21. doi:10.1093/bjps/axt047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steger, Rick, and Caldwell, Roy L.. 1983. “Intraspecific Deception by Bluffing: A Defense Strategy of Newly Molted Stomatopods (Arthropoda: Crustacea).” Science 221:558–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. 2012. The Evolved Apprentice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Peter D., and Jonker, Leo B.. 1978. “Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics.” Mathematical Biosciences 40:145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Elliott O. 2012. “Deterministic Chaos and the Evolution of Meaning.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63:547–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Amotz. 1975. “Mate Selection: A Selection for a Handicap.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 53:205–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zollman, Kevin J. S., Bergstrom, Carl T., and Huttegger, Simon M.. 2013. “Between Cheap and Costly Signals: The Evolution of Partially Honest Communication.” Proceedings of the Royal Society. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollman, Kevin J. S., and Smead, Rory. 2010. “Plasticity and Language: An Example of the Baldwin Effect?” Philosophical Studies 147:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar