Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:20:39.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aharonov Approach to Equilibrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Foad Dizadji-Bahmani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using the ‘Aharonov approach’, Linden and colleagues purportedly prove that reaching equilibrium is a universal property of quantum systems. Such a proof would constitute a very significant result in the foundations of statistical mechanics. I argue that, as it stands, this proof is not sound. However, based on the their theorems, I construct an argument for the conclusion that an arbitrary small subsystem of a large quantum system typically tends toward and remains in, or close to, equilibrium. This is the central result of the article. In the final part of the article, I defend the Aharonov approach against anti-interventionist criticisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 976 - 988
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to J. McKenzie Alexander, Seamus Bradley, Erik Curiel, Roman Frigg, Wolfgang Pietsch, Miklós Rédei, and audiences at Philosophy of Probability in Physics Workshop, Carl von Linde-Akademie, Technical University Munich (2009); Philosophy of Natural Sciences Research Seminar, London School of Economics and Political Science (2009); British Society for Population Studies Annual Conference, Utah Education Association (2009); and Philosophy of Science Association Biennial Conference, Montreal (2010) for very valuable critical discussions and feedback.

References

Ainsworth, P. 2005. “The Spin-Echo Experiment and Statistical Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics Letters 18:621–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, D. 1994a. “The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and the Approach to Thermodynamic Equilibrium.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45:669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, D.. 1994b. “The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and the Approach to Thermodynamic Equilibrium.” Erkenntnis 41:191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, D.. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bricmont, J. 1996. “Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science?” In The Flight from Science and Reason, ed. Gross, P. R., Levitt, N., and Lewis, M. W., 131–75. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 775. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Callender, Craig. 2001. Taking Thermodynamics (Too) Seriously. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4): 539–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. 1974. The Physics of Time Asymmetry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman. 2008. “A Field Guide to Recent Work on the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.” In The Ashgate Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Physics, ed. Rickles, Dean, 99–196. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman. 2009. “Typicality and the Approach to Equilibrium in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics.” Philosophy of Science 76 (5): 997–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O.. 2001. “Can We Explain Thermodynamics by Quantum Decoherence?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4): 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmo, M., and Shenker, O.. 2003. “Quantum Decoherence and the Approach to Equilibrium I.” Philosophy of Science 70:330–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. 1987. Asymmetries in Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linden, N., Popescu, S., Short, A. J., and Winter, A.. 2008. “Quantum Mechanical Evolution towards Thermal Equilibrium.” arXiv, Cornell University, arXiv:0812.2385v1.Google Scholar
Popescu, S., Short, A. J., and Winter, A.. 2006. “Entanglement and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics.” Nature Physics 2 (11): 754–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridderbos, T. M., and Redhead, M. L. G.. 1998. “The Spin-Echo Experiments and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.” Foundations of Physics 28:1237–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, Lawrence. 1993. Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar