No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Untilled Field of Field Campaigns
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2016
Abstract
This paper considers the challenges and opportunities of conducting a thick, qualitative study of a twenty-first century presidential ground campaign. Our goals in the study were to describe phenomena that are not commonly examined in most studies of field campaigns, namely (a) the purportedly transformative impact of the campaign on both individuals and collective contexts, (b) the holistic interaction of different strategic elements of the campaign, and (c) the processes the campaign used to develop citizen leadership to scale the campaign. We also consider the limitations of our approach, the reception of a book intended for both academic and practitioner audiences, and underexploited research agendas in the study of campaigns.
- Type
- Praxis
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016
References
Collier, David and Elman, Colin. 2008. “Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Organizations, Publication, and Reflections on Integration.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, 779–95. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 2005 [1961]. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1912] 2008. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald and Gerber, Alan. 2008. Get out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. 2d ed. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Green, Donald and Gerber, Alan. 2015. Get out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. 3d ed. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hackman, Richard. 2002. Leading Teams: Setting the State for Great Performances. New York: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Karpf, David, Kreiss, Daniel, Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis, and Powers, Matthew. 2015. “Qualitative Political Communication| Introduction—the Role of Qualitative Methods in Political Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Communication 9: 1888–906.Google Scholar
Nickerson, David and Feller, Avi. 2008. “Can Voter Turnout Contaminate a Neighborhood?” Presented at the Harvard Networks in Political Science Conference, Cambridge, MA, June 13.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2015. “Goodbye to Pluralism? Studying Power in Contemporary American Politics.” Presented at the Wildavsky Forum for Public Policy at the Goldman School for Public Policy, Berkeley, CA, April 9, 2015.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L.. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55(1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2016. Building a Business of Politics: The Rise of Political Consulting and the Transformation of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, David. 2007. “Explicating Dynamic Capabilties: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance).” Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2002 [1838]. Democracy in America. Mansfield, Harvey and Winthrop, Debra, eds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T. 2014. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar