Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:26:03.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Power and Limits of Russia’s Strategic Narrative in Ukraine: The Role of Linkage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

Abstract

Governments project strategic narratives about international affairs, hoping thereby to shape the perceptions and behaviour of foreign audiences. If individuals encounter incompatible narratives projected by different states, how can their acceptance of one narrative over another be explained? I suggest that support for the strategic narrative of a foreign government is more likely when there is social and communicative linkage at the individual level, i.e., when an individual maintains personal and cultural connections to the foreign state through regular travel, media consumption, religious attendance, and conversations with friends or relatives. The role of linkage is demonstrated in Ukraine, where a “pro-Russian, anti-Western” narrative projected from Moscow has been competing against a “pro-Western, anti-Russian” narrative projected from Kyiv. Previous accounts of international persuasion have been framed in terms of a state’s resources producing advantageous “soft power.” However, I propose a shift in focus—from the resources states have to what individuals do to maintain social and communicative ties via which ideas cross borders. In a competitive discursive environment such linkage can in fact have mixed consequences for the states involved, as the Ukrainian case illustrates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amos, Howard. 2015. “‘There Was Heroism and Cruelty on Both Sides’: The Truth behind One of Ukraine’s Deadliest Days.” The Guardian, April 30. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/30/there-was-heroism-and-cruelty-on-both-sides-the-truth-behind-one-of-ukraines-deadliest-days.Google Scholar
Arel, Dominique. 2006. “La face cachée de la Révolution Orange: l’Ukraine en négation face à son problème régional [The hidden face of the Orange Revolution: Ukraine in denial towards its regional problem].” Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest 37(4): pp. 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arel, Dominique and Khmelko, Valeri. 1996. “The Russian Factor and Territorial Polarization in Ukraine.” Harriman Review 9(1–2): 8191.Google Scholar
Armandon, Emmanuelle. 2013. “Popular Assessments of Ukraine’s Relations with Russia and the European Union under Yanukovych.” Demokratizatsiya 21(2): 289308.Google Scholar
Bailard, Catie Snow. 2016. “China in Africa: An Analysis of the Effect of Chinese Media Expansion on African Public Opinion.” International Journal of Press/Politics 21(4): 446–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, Lowell W. and Faranda, Regina. 2009. “Reexamining Region, Ethnicity, and Language in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 25(3): 232–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, Lowell W. and Herron, Erik S.. 2004. “One Ukraine or Many? Regionalism in Ukraine and Its Political Consequences.” Nationalities Papers 32(1): 5386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrington, Lowell W., Herron, Eric S., and Silver, Brian D.. 2003. “The Motherland Is calling: Views of Homeland among Russians in the Near Abroad.” World Politics 55(2): 290313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Iyengar, Shanto. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication 58(4): 707–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 1994. “The politics of ethnicity: Russians in the new Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 46(2): 261283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R., Graf, Joseph, and Willnat, Lars. 2003. “Priming or Framing? Media Influence on Attitudes toward Foreign Countries.” Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies 65(6): 493508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Kenzie, O’Loughlin, Ben, Gillespie, Marie, and McAvoy, Eva Nieto. 2015. “Soft Power and Its Audiences: Tweeting the Olympics from London 2012 to Sochi 2014.” Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 12(1): 413–37.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2006. “The Backlash against Democracy Promotion” Foreign Affairs 85(2): 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilliplane, Susanna, Goldman, Seth K., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2013. “Televised Exposure to Politics: New Measures for a Fragmented Media Environment.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EuromaidanPress. 2015. “Monument to Russian Media Fakes Unveiled in Ukraine.” August 25. Available at http://euromaidanpress.com/2015/08/25/monument-to-russian-media-fakes-unveiled-in-ukraine.Google Scholar
Feklyunina, Valentina. 2016. “Soft Power and Identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian World(s).’” European Journal of International Relations 22(4): 773–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Douglas A. and Perse, Elizabeth M.. 1993. “Media and Audience Influences on Channel Repertoire.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37(1): 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, Michael J. 1976. “Results and Effects of Study Abroad.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 424: 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, Hugh D. 1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, Hugh D. 2004. “Ethnic Conflict and the Contact Hypothesis.” In The Psychology of Ethnic and Cultural Conflict. Psychological Dimensions to War and Peace, ed. Lee, Y.-T., McCauley, C., Moghaddam, F., and Worchel, S.. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Tuomas and Smith, Hanna. 2016. “Russian Cultural Statecraft in the Eurasian Space.” Problems of Post-Communism 63(3): 129–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardone, Iginio. 2013. “China as a Persuader: CCTV Africa’s First Steps in the African Mediasphere.” Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies 34(3): 2540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, Michael. 2015. “West Oriented in the East-Oriented Donbas: A Political Stratigraphy of Geopolitical Identity in Luhansk, Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31(3): 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimov, Valeriy. 2013. “Tsennost nauki v predvidenii” [The value of science is in prediction]. Voyenno-Promyshlenyy Kuryer. February 27. Available at http://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/14632.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Marie and Webb, Alban, eds. 2013. Diasporas and Diplomacy: Cosmopolitan Contact Zones at the BBC World Service (1932–2012). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Benjamin E. and Horiuchi, Yusaku. 2012. “In Search of Soft Power: Does Foreign Public Opinion Matter for U.S. Foreign Policy?” World Politics 64(3): 555–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grix, Jonathan and Houlihan, Barrie. 2014. “Sports Mega-Events as Part of a Nation’s Soft Power Strategy: The Cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012).” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 16(4): 572–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, Andrew M. 2014. “Measure for Measure: An Experimental Test of Online Political Media Exposure.” Political Analysis 23(1): 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Albert C. 1992. “Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes towards Media Coverage of Social Groups.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, Falk. 2015. “Communicating China to the World: Confucius Institutes and China’s Strategic Narratives.” Politics 35(3–4): 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Craig. 2012. The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Soft Power and the UK’s Influence. 2014. “Persuasion and Power in the Modern World. ” London: UK House of Lords.Google Scholar
Hudson, Victoria. 2015. “‘Forced to Friendship’? Russian (Mis-)Understandings of Soft Power and the Implications for Audience Attraction in Ukraine.” Politics 35(3–4): 330–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, Thomas. 2016. “Promoting Russia abroad: Russia’s Post-Cold War National Identity and Public Diplomacy.” Journal of International Communication 22(1): 8295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, David W. 2011. “The Hard Truths about Soft Power.” Journal of Political Power 4(1): 6585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiseleva, Yulia. 2015. “Russia’s Soft Power Discourse: Identity, Status and the Attraction of Power.” Politics 35(3–4): 316–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolossov, Vladimir. 2003. “‘High’ and ‘Low’ Geopolitics: Images of Foreign Countries in the Eyes of Russian Citizens.” Geopolitics 8(1): 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubicek, Paul. 2000. “Regional Polarisation in Ukraine: Public Opinion, Voting and Legislative Behaviour.” Europe-Asia Studies 52(2): 273–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulyk, Volodymyr. 2011. “Language Identity, Linguistic Diversity and Political Cleavages: Evidence from Ukraine.” Nations and nationalism 17(3): 6 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power Is Transforming the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2015. “Indeks resultativnosti rossiyskoy propagandy” [Index of Russian Propaganda Effectiveness]. March 25. Available at http://kiis.com.ua/?lang=rus&cat=reports&id=510&page=1.Google Scholar
LaCour, Michael J. and Vavreck, Lynn. 2014. “Improving Media Measurement: Evidence from the Field.” Political Communication 31(3): 408–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2016. “The Three Colors of Novorossiya, or the Russian Nationalist Mythmaking of the Ukrainian Crisis.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32(1): 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2005. “International Linkage and Democratization.” Journal of Democracy 16(3): 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes in the Post-Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Mingjiang. 2009. Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham, ND: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lucas, Edward and Pomerantsev, Peter. 2016. “Winning the Information War: Techniques and Counter-Strategies to Russian Propaganda in Central and Eastern Europe. ” Washington, DC: Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA).Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Sirke. 2016. “In Search of the Status of an Educational Great Power? Analysis of Russia’s Educational Diplomacy Discourse.” Problems of Post-Communism 63(3): 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manheim, Jarol B. and Albritton, Robert B.. 1984. “Changing National Images: International Public Relations and Media Agenda Setting.” American Political Science Review 78(3): 641–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially. 2005. “Why ‘Soft Power’ Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics.” Millennium—Journal of International Studies 33(3): 583612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Ian and White, Stephen. 2002. “NATO Enlargement and Eastern Opinion.” European Security 11(4): 4758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1996. “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being So Positive...) ” Law & Social Inquiry 21(2): 457–82.Google Scholar
McConnell, David L. and Watanabe, Yasushi. 2008. Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2000. “Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation]. July 11. Available at http://www.ng.ru/world/2000-07-11/1_concept.html.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2013. “Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation]. February 12. Available at http://archive.mid.ru//brp_4.nsf/0/6D84DDEDEDBF7DA644257B160051BF7F.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2016. “Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation]. December 1. Available at http://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2542248.Google Scholar
Miskimmon, Alister, O’Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura. 2013. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, Neil. 2007. “Which Way Does Ukraine Face? Popular Orientations toward Russia and Western Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 54(6): 4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimmo, Ben. 2016. “How MH17 Gave Birth to the Modern Russian Spin Machine.” Foreign Policy, September 29. Available at http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/29/how-mh17-gave-birth-to-the-modern-russian-spin-machine-putin-ukraine.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2008. “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 94109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, John. 2001. “The Regional Factor In Contemporary Ukrainian Politics: Scale, Place, Space, or Bogus Effect?” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 42(1): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradise, James F. 2009. “China and International Harmony: The Role of Confucius Institutes in Bolstering Beijing’s Soft Power.” Asian Survey 49(4): 647–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark and Hurwitz, Jon. 1992. “International Events and Foreign Policy Beliefs: Public Response to Changing Soviet-U.S. Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 36(2): 431–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervyy Kanal. 2014. “Bezhenka iz Slovyanska vspominayet, kak pri ney kaznili malenkogo syna i zhenu opolchentsa” [Refugee from Slovyansk recalls how she saw the execution of young son and wife of a civil guard]. July 12. Available at https://www.1tv.ru/news/2014/07/12/37175-bezhenka_iz_slavyanska_vspominaet_kak_pri_ney_kaznili_malenkogo_syna_i_zhenu_opolchentsa.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. and Tropp, Linda R.. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F., Tropp, Linda R., Wagner, Ulrich, and Christ, Oliver. 2011. “Recent Advances in Intergroup Contact Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35(3): 271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirie, Paul S. 1996. “National Identity and Politics in Southern and Eastern Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies 48(7): 10791104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantsev, Peter. 2015a. Hearing: Confronting Russia’s Weaponization of Information. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, April 15. Available at http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/hearing/hearing-confronting-russia-s-weaponization-information.Google Scholar
Pomerantsev, Peter. 2015b. Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: Adventures in Modern Russia. Kindle edition. Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Price, Monroe Edwin. 1995. Television, the Public Sphere, and National Identity. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Monroe Edwin, Haas, Susan, and Margolin, Drew. 2008. “New Technologies and International Broadcasting: Reflections on Adaptations and Transformations.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 150–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary. 2012. “Approaches to Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in China and Taiwan.” Journal of International Communication 18(2): 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawnsley, Gary D. 2015. “To Know Us Is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China.” Politics 35(3–4): 273–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roselle, Laura, Miskimmon, Alister, O’Loughlin, and Ben. 2014. “Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power.” Media, War & Conflict 7(1): 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roxburgh, Angus. 2012. The Strongman: Vladimir Putin and the Struggle for Russia. London: I.B.Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwen, Michael B. and Matera, Frances R.. 1992. “Public Salience of Foreign Nations.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 69(3): 623–32.Google Scholar
Security Council of the Russian Federation. 2016. “Doktrina informatsionnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Doctrine of information security of the Russian Federation]. December 5. Available at http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/6/5.html.Google Scholar
Semetko, Holli A., Brzinski, Joanne Bay, Weaver, David, and Willnat, Lars. 1992. “TV News and U.S. Public Opinion about Foreign Countries: The Impact of Exposure and Attention.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4(1): 1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, Nancy. 2008. “International Exchanges and the U.S. Image.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 198222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surowiec, Pawel. 2017. Nation Branding, Public Relations and Soft Power: Corporatising Poland. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Szostek, Joanna. 2014. “Russia and the News Media in Ukraine: A Case of ‘Soft Power’?” East European Politics & Societies 28(3): 463–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szostek, Joanna. 2016. “Defence and Promotion of Desired State Identity in Russia’s Strategic narrative.” Geopolitics. Online first August 11. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1214910.Google Scholar
Trilokekar, Roopa Desai. 2009. “International Education as Soft Power? The Contributions and Challenges of Canadian Foreign Policy to the Internationalization of Higher Education.” Higher Education 59(2): 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TSN. 2013. “Dmitriyu Kiselevu ‘za lozh i akhineyu’ peredali ‘Oskar’ v pryamom efire” [Dmitriy Kiselev receives an ‘Oscar’ live on air ‘for lies and nonsense’]. December 8. Available at http://ru.tsn.ua/politika/dmitriyu-kiselevu-za-lozh-i-ahineyu-peredali-oskar-v-pryamom-efire-video-338120.html.Google Scholar
Van Herpen, Marcel H. 2015. Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Walker, Christopher. 2016. “The Hijacking of ‘Soft Power’.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanta, Wayne, Golan, Guy, and Lee, Cheolhan. 2004. “Agenda Setting and International News: Media Influence On Public Perceptions of Foreign Nations.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81(2): 364–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Jon. 2016. “Dismiss, Distort, Distract and Dismay: Continuity and Change in Russian Disinformation. Institute for European Studies Policy Brief 13. May. Available at http://www.ies.be/node/3689.Google Scholar
White, Stephen, Korosteleva, Julia, and Allison, Roy. 2006. “NATO: The View from the East.” European Security 15(2): 165–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen, McAllister, Ian, and Feklyunina, Valentina. 2010. “Belarus, Ukraine and Russia: East or West?” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 12(3): 344–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen, McAllister, Ian, and Light, Margot. 2002. “Englargement and The New Outsiders.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40(1): 135–53.Google Scholar
Yablokov, Ilya. 2015. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35(3–4): 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Rui. 2010. “Soft Power and Higher Education: An Examination of China’s Confucius Institutes.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 8(2): 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youmans, William Lafi and Powers, Shawn. 2012. “Remote Negotiations: International Broadcasting as Bargaining in the Information Age.” International Journal of Communication 6: 2149–72.Google Scholar
File 28.4 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Szostek supplementay material

Appendix

Download Szostek supplementay material(PDF)
PDF 526.3 KB