Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:22:35.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Policyscape and the Challenges of Contemporary Politics to Policy Maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Suzanne Mettler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary political life takes place amid a “policyscape,” a landscape densely laden with policies created in the past that have themselves become established institutions, bearing consequences for governing operations, the policy agenda, and political behavior. Far from being static, policies often develop over time in ways that could not have been foreseen by their creators, due to dynamics they themselves generate, including design effects, unintended consequences, and lateral effects. Owing to such dynamics, existing policies require upkeep and maintenance if they are to continue to function well. The extent to which lawmakers engage effectively in such work varies, however, depending on the fit between the demands of the policyscape and the attributes of the historical political context. Bipartisan reform efforts occurred in many policy areas as recently as the early 1990s. More recently, partisan polarization and other developments have undermined such political capacity, leaving numerous policies untended for long periods and in many instances, even formal reauthorization long overdue. A cursory overview of policies associated with Americans’ top 20 policy priorities reveals that more than half are subject to deferred maintenance. The mismatch between the demands of the policyscape and the character of contemporary politics imperils effective democratic governance.

Type
Articles
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 369 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernathy, Scott Franklin. 2007. No Child Left Behind and the Public Schools. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Adler, E. Scott and Wilkerson, John D.. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
American Society of Civil Engineers. 2015. “2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure.” http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/grades/ Google Scholar
Baime, David S. and Mullin, Christopher M.. 2011. “Promoting Educational Opportunity: The Pell Grant Program at Community Colleges.” Washington, DC: AACC Policy Brief 2011-03PbL. http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/briefs/Documents/Policybrief_Pell%20Grant.pdf Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Bendix, William. N. D. “Bypassing Congressional Committees: Parties, Panel Rosters, and Deliberative Processes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2012. “The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs, 1971–2003.” In Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking, ed. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 1999. “Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 519–33.Google Scholar
Blodget, Henry. 2013. “Yes, Of Course We Should Cut Military Spending!” Business Insider. February 10.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “The Punctuated Origins of Senate Polarization.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(1): 5–26, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2253028 Google Scholar
Bound, John, Lovenheim, Michael, and Turner, Sarah. 2010. “Increasing Time to Baccalaureate Degree in the United States.” Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Research Report 10-698, April. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15892.Google Scholar
Brewer, Mark D. and Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. 2007. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Bruch, Sarah K., Marx Ferree, Myra, and Soss, Joe. 2010. “From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism, and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens.” American Sociological Review 75(2): 205–26.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campaign Finance Institute. 2013. “Table 3.1: The Cost of Winning a House and Senate Seat, 1986–2012.” http://www.cfinst.org/data/historicalstats.aspx Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2010. “Institutional Strangulation: Bureaucratic Politics and Financial Reform in the Obama Administration.” Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 825–46.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2016. “Lobbying Database.” http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby Google Scholar
Charles, Guy-Uriel E. and Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis. 2015. “The Voting Rights Act in Winter: The Death of a Superstatute.” Iowa Law Review 100: 1389–439.Google Scholar
College Board. 2013. “Maximum Pell Grant as Percentage of Tuition and Fees and Total Charges over Time.” Trends in Higher Education Series . New York: College Board.Google Scholar
College Board. 2014. Trends in Student Aid. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Conetta, Carl. 2010. “Dynamics of Defense Budget Growth, 1998–2011.” Project on Defense Alternatives. http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/Conetta%20paper%201%20June.pdf, accessed February 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Cox, James H. 2004. Reviewing Delegation: An Analysis of the Congressional Reauthorization Process. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee and Teles, Steven. 2015. “A New Agenda for Political Reform.” Washington Monthly, March/April/May.Google Scholar
Ejdemyr, Simon, Nall, Clayton, and O’Keefe, Zachary. 2015. “Building Inequality: The Permanence of Infrastructure and the Limits of Democratic Representation.” http://web.stanford.edu/∼nall/docs/di.pdf Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. and Ferejohn, John. 2001. “Super-statutes.” Duke Law Journal 50: 12–15–1276.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 2015. “Federal Net Outlays as Percent of Gross Domestic Product,” Economic Research. https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/FYONGDA188S Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Glied, Sherry and Zaylor, Abigail. 2015.” Predictable Unpredictability: The Problem with Basing Medicare Policy on Long-Term Financial Forecasting.” Commonwealth Fund, Brief 1828, 22.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–81.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Maurice R. 2014. “Trends in US Military Spending.” Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.cfr.org/defense-budget/trends-us-military-spending/p28855, accessed February 1, 2016.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2004. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–60.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3) 643–62.Google Scholar
Hall, Thad. 2004. Authorizing Policy. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Andrew J. 2015. “The New US Highway Bill Is Stuck in the Past.” The Verge, December 7.Google Scholar
Herzenshorn, David M. 2015. “Bipartisan Talks Yield $300 Billion Highway Bill.” New York Times, December 1.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review 99(1): 107–123.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Milkis, Sidney M., eds. 2014. “Introduction: The Rise of a Policy State?” In The Politics of Major Postwar Policy Reforms in Postwar America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kane, Thomas J., Orszag, Peter R., and Gunter, David. 2003. “State Fiscal Constraints and Higher Education Spending.” Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Discussion Paper 12.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 2015. Move. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laing, Keith. 2014. “GOP Rep: Highway Bill ‘A Priority for Us.” The Hill, December 4.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83–110.Google Scholar
Layzer, Judith A. 2011. “Cold Front: How the Recession Stalled Obama’s Clean-Energy Agenda.” In Reaching For a New Deal, ed. Skocpol, Theda and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerman, Amy A. and Weaver, Vesla M.. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewallen, Jonathan, Theriault, Sean M., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. “Congressional Dysfunction and the Decline of Problem Solving.” Prepared for presentation at the 2015 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL, April 16–19.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 2014. “A Cascade of Failures: Why Government Fails, and How to Stop It.” Center for Effective Public Management . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore, et al. . 1977. Poliscide. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mahan, Shannon M. 2011. “Federal Pell Grant Program of the Higher Education Act: Background, Recent Changes, and Current Legislative Issues.” Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest and Shipan, Charles R.. 2012. “Beyond Legislative Productivity: Enactment Conditions, Subsequent Conditions, and the Shape and Life of the Law.” In, Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking, ed. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1991. Divided We Govern. New haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2005. “No Child Left Behind and the Federal Role in Education: Evolution or Revolution?” Peabody Journal of Education. 80(2): 19–38.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2011. “Surprising Momentum: Spurring Education Reform in States and Localities.” In Reaching For a New Deal, ed. Skocpol, Theda and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2010. “Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era.” Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 803–25.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2014. Degrees of Inequality: How the Politics of Higher Education Policy Sabotaged the American Dream. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and SoRelle, Mallory. 2014. “Policy Feedback.” In Theories of the Policy Process, 3d ed., ed. Sabatier, Paul. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and Soss, Joe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 55–73.Google Scholar
Meyers, Roy T. 2014. “The Implosion of the Federal Budget Process: Triggers, Commissions, Cliffs, Sequesters, Debt Ceilings, and Shutdow.” Public Budgeting & Finance 34(4): 1–23.Google Scholar
Michelman, Barbara. 2012. “The Never-Ending Story of ESEA Reauthorization.” ASCD Policy Priorities 18(1), http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/policy_priorities/vol18/num01/The_Never-Ending_Story_of_ESEA_Reauthorization.aspx.Google Scholar
Moore, Colin. 2015. “Innovation without Reputation: How Bureaucrats Saved the Veterans’ Health Care System.” Perspectives on Politics 13(3): 327–44.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. and Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2011. The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nall, Clayton. 2015. “The Political Consequences of Spatial Policies: How Interstate Highways Facilitated Geographic Polarization.” Journal of Politics 77(2): 394–406.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. 2014. The Condition of Education.http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cha.asp.Google Scholar
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. 2013. Current Term Enrollment Report – Fall 2013. http://nscresearchcenter.org/currenttermenrollmentestimate-fall2013/.Google Scholar
Oberlander, Jonathan and Weaver, R. Ken. 2015. “Unravelling from Within? The Affordable Care Act and Self-Undermining Policy Feedbacks.” The Forum 13(1): 37–62.Google Scholar
O’Hanlon, Michael. 2015. “America’s Military Is the Best: What about the Acquisition Process?” National Interest, April 16.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen. 2014. “Pathways to the Present: Political Development in America.” In Oxford Handbook on American Political Development, ed. Valelly, Richard, Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Available online at: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/ Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. 2008. Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patashnick, Eric M. and Zelizer, Julian E.. 2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics 11(4): 1071–87.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. “Public’s Policy Priorities Reflect Changing Conditions at Home and Abroad.” January 15. http://www.people-press.org/2015/01/15/publics-policy-priorities-reflect-changing-conditions-at-home-and-abroad/ Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45(4): 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2007. “Public Policies as Institutions.” In Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen, and Galvin, Dan. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2014. “Conclusion: Madison Upside Down.” In The Politics of Major Policy Reform in Postwar America, ed. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Milkis, Sidney M... New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1984. Implementation., 3d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Priest, Dana and Arkin, William M.. 2010. “A Hidden World, Growing Beyond Control.” Washington Post, July 19.Google Scholar
Ragusa, Jordan. 2010. “The Lifecycle of Public Policy: An Event History Analysis of Repeals to Landmark Legislative Enactments, 1951–2006.” American Politics Research 38(6): 1015–51.Google Scholar
Robertson, David Brian. 2014. “Federalism.” In Oxford Handbook on American Political Development, ed. Valelly, Richard, Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Available online at http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/ Google Scholar
Rose, Deondra Eunique. 2012. “The Development of U.S. Higher Education Policy and Its Impact on the Gender Dynamics of American Citizenship.” PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard and Davies, Phillip L.. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change without Choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2005. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2013. “Naming the Problem: What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming.” Presented at Harvard University, Symposium on “The Politics of America’s Fight Against Global Warming,” February 14, 2013. Available at http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/skocpol_captrade_report_january_2013_0.pdf Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of the Republican Party. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2009. “Taking Stock.” In The Unsustainable American State, ed. Jacobs, Lawrence and King, Desmond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93(2): 363–80.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2012. “Kludgeocracy: The American Way of Policy.” New America Foundation. http://newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Teles_Steven_Kludgeocracy_NAF_Dec2012.pdf Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen and Streeck, Wolfgang, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
TRIP: A National Transportation Research Group 2015. “Key Facts about America’s Surface Transportation System and Federal Funding.” April. http://www.tripnet.org/docs/Fact_Sheet_National.pdf Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. 1989. Radicalism in the States: The Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party and the American Political Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar