Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:23:36.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neoliberalism, Race, and the American Welfare State

A Discussion of Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram's Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2012

Lawrence M. Mead
Lawrence M. Mead*
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. By Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. 368p. $75.00 cloth, $25.00 paper.

It is more than 15 years since the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act was passed in 1996, famously described by then-President Bill Clinton as “the end of welfare as we know it.” In Disciplining the Poor, Joe Soss, Richard Fording, and Sanford Schram analyze recent changes in US welfare policy as reflections of broader transformations of the “governance” of poverty, arguing that these transformations represent a new form of “neoliberal paternalism” in which race continues to be an important element. In this symposium, a diverse group of political scientists working on welfare issues have been asked to critically assess the book's account and to comment more broadly on the importance of the “governance of poverty” to the future of American politics.—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: Neoliberalism, Race, and the American Welfare State
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 982 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, Jane L., and Mayer, Victoria. 2010. Both Hands Tied: Welfare Reform and the Race to the Bottom of the Low-Wage Labor Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael B. 1986. In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
King, Desmond. 1999. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Lurie, Irene. 2006. At the Front Lines of the Welfare System: A Perspective on the Decline in Welfare Caseloads. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 1986. Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 2003. “Is Complaint a Moral Argument?” In NOMOS XLIV: Child, Family, and State, ed. Macedo, Stephen and Young, Iris Marion. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 2007. “Why Welfare Reform Succeeded.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26 (2): 370–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M. 2010. “Scholasticism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 453–64.Google Scholar
Mead, Lawrence M., ed. 1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Katherine S. 1999. No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. New York: Knopf and Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Parrott, Sharon, and Sherman, Arloc. 2007. “TANF's Results are More Mixed than is Often Understood.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26(2): 374–81.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Riccucci, Norma M. 2005. How Management Matters: Street Level Bureaucrats and Welfare Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F. 2000. After Welfare: The Culture of Postindustrial Social Policy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2008. The Samaritan's Dilemma: Should Government Help Your Neighbor? New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
US Congress, House Committee on Ways and Means. 2004. 2004 Green Book: Background Material, and Data on the Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Congress, House Committee on Ways and Means. 2011. 2011 Green Book: Background Material, and Data on the Programs Within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar