Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:02:24.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination: Reframing, Resolving, and Replacing the (Counter)Majoritarian Difficulty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2016

Matthew E.K. Hall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For centuries, politicians, activists, and academics have criticized the American system of judicial review as democratically illegitimate. In response, dozens of scholars have striven to justify the institution’s place in a democratic political system. A compelling justification for judicial review must provide a realistic description of its function and a normatively attractive understanding of that function. Unfortunately, the most prominent justifications suffer from empirical or theoretical problems. However, recent empirical evidence suggests an “acquittal theory” that meets both criteria. On this view, courts armed with judicial review can thwart majority will by relieving individuals from government sanctions, but they lack the power to independently impose sanctions. This asymmetry suggests a resolution to the countermajoritarian difficulty that does not rely on judicial wisdom or behavior: the nature of judicial power ensures that judicial review reliably promotes a core democratic value—freedom from government domination—without seriously threatening other democratic values.

Type
Articles
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 391 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2000. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “The Supreme Court in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 161–80.Google Scholar
Bellany, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1986. “New Theories of ‘Interpretation’: The Activist Flight from the Constitution.” Ohio State Law Journal 47(1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of American Politics. 2d ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bitler, Marianne and Zavodny, Madeline. 2002. “Did Abortion Legalization Reduce the Number of Unwanted Children? Evidence from Adoptions.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34(1): 25–33.Google Scholar
Black, Charles. 1960. The People and the Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 360–72.Google Scholar
Brent, James C. 1999. “An Agent and Two Principals: U.S. Court of Appeals Responses to Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” American Politics Quarterly 27(2): 236–66.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. 1980. “The Misconceived Quest for Original Understanding.” Boston University Law Review 60: 204–38.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul, Levinson, Sanford, Balkin, Jack M., Reed Amar, Akhil, and Siegel, Reva B.. 2014. Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey. 2007. Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rebecca L. 1998. “Accountability, Liberty, and the Constitution.” Columbia Law Review 98(3): 531–79.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1987. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR’s Court-packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81(4): 1139–53.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1991. “Courts and Public Opinion.” In American Courts: A Critical Assessment, ed. Gates, John B. and Johnson, Charles A.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Calvin, Bryan Jr., , Paul Collins, M., and Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew. 2010. “On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 736–48.Google Scholar
Casillas, Christopher, Enns, Peter K., and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 74–88.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. and May, David A.. 1999. “A Political Regimes Approach to the Analysis of Legal Decisions.” Polity 32(2): 233–52.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. and Mitchell Pickerill, J.. 2004. “Guess What Happened on the Way to the Revolution? Precursors to the Supreme Court’s Federalism Revolution.” Publius 34(3): 85–114.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. and Mitchell Pickerill, J.. 2006. “The Politics of Criminal Justice: How the New Right Regime Shaped the Rehnquist Court’s Criminal Justice Jurisprudence.” Georgetown Law Review 94: 1385–425.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. and Nelson, Blake J.. 2001. “Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decision Making.” Northwestern University Law Review 95(Summer): 1437–93.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 2003. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dann, Carrie and Rafferty, Andrew. 2015. “2016 Candidates React to Supreme Court’s Gay Marriage Ruling.” http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/2016-candidates-react-supreme-courts-gay-marriage-ruling-n382441. Accessed September 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Den Otter, Ronald. 2009. Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, John J. III and Levitt, Stephen D.. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1): 425–40.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. 2010. “The Majoritarian Difficulty and Theories of Constitutional Decision Making.” Journal of Constitutional Law 13(2): 283–304.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom’s Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 95(6): 1401–40.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2008. “The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 121(7): 1693–736.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. and Rubin, Edward L.. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B. and Dan Wood, B.. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Mood.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 468–98.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., Bohte, John, and Wood, B. D.. 1997. “One Voice among Many: The Supreme Court’s Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–1992.” American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1224–50.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 751–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 1993. “Dialogue and Judicial Review.” Michigan Law Review 91: 577–682.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2002. “The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty.” Yale Law Journal 112: 153–259.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review 23(3): 469–96.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Blackstone, Bethany, and Vining, Richard L.. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 70(2): 293–306.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 511–24.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2003. “Judicial Independence through the Lens of Bush v. Gore: Four Lessons from Political Science.” Ohio State Law Journal 64: 249–64.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C. and Huber, Gregory A.. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(2): 107–38.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1993. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7(2): 35–73.Google Scholar
Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court’s Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 33(4): 502–19.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2011. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2014. “The Semi-Constrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 352–66.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K., Kirkland, Justin H., and Windett, Jason Harold. 2015. “Holding Steady on Shifting Sands: Countermajoritarian Decision Making in the US Courts of Appeals.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79(2): 504–23.Google Scholar
Harvey, Anna and Friedman, Barry. 2006. “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Rulings, 1987–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(4): 533–62.Google Scholar
Hensch, Mark. 2015. “Jindal: ‘Let’s Just Get Rid of the Court’.” http://thehill.com/ blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/246301-jindal-lets-just-get-rid-of-the-court. Accessed September 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Justiocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94(1): 89–100.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2005. “Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 317–28.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” Journal of Politics 58(4): 1079–102.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Robert M. and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2002. “An Original Look at Originalism.” Law & Society Review 36(1): 113–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert J. 2013. Courthouse Democracy and Minority Rights: Same-Sex Marriage in the States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R. and Martin, Andrew D.. 1998. “The Public’s Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 299–309.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2007. “Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools.” Law & Social Inquiry 32(3): 511–44.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1997a. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85: 491–553.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1997b. “Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions.” Virginia Law Review 82(1): 1–67.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemieux, Scott E. and Watkins, David J.. 2009. “Beyond the ‘Countermajoritarian Difficulty’: Lessons from Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Polity 41(1): 30–62.Google Scholar
Lynch, Gerald. 1978. “Book Review of Government by Judiciary.” Cornell Law Review 63: 1091–100.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1985. “Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 20: 1–70.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. and Stimson, James A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1018–35.Google Scholar
McMahon, Kevin J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Way to Brown. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, William and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12(4): 363–84.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20(4): 457–77.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. 2001. “Law as a Functional Kind.” In Natural Law and Modern Moral Theory, ed. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Robert F. 2001. “Judicial Power and the Restoration of Federalism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574: 52–65.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 711–24.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J. 2010. “The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 412–27.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1(1): 35–59.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds v. Sims . 1964. 377 U.S. 533.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2006. The Most Democratic Branch: How Courts Serve America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2d ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2014. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Westerland, Chad, and Lindquist, Stephanie A.. 2011. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and Judicial Review: Testing a Constitutional Separation of Powers Model.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 89–104.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 673–96.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R. and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43(2): 297–316.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.Google Scholar
Sweet, Martin J. 2010. Merely Judgment: Ignoring, Evading, and Trumping the Supreme Court. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2005. A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
United States v. Cox . 1965. 432 F. 2d. 167.Google Scholar
Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2014. “Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 110–26.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13(1): 18–51.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review.” Yale Law Journal 115(6): 346–1406.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. “Bicameralism.” New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 330. http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu plltwp/330.Google Scholar
Watkins, David J. and Lemieux, Scott E.. 2015. “Compared to What? Judicial Review and Other Veto Points in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Perspectives on Politics 13(2): 312–26.Google Scholar
Westerland, Chad, Segal, Jeffrey A., Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles M., and Comparato, Scott. 2010. “Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 891–905.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99(4): 583–96.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2007. The Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Robert. 1788. “The Power of the Judiciary, Part 1.” New York Journal, March 20.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar