Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:50:46.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergency, Liberalism, and the State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

David Dyzenhaus
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Extract

Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power. By Clement Fatovic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009. 368p. $55.00.

Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. By Bonnie Honig. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. 218p. $26.95.

States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies. By Nomi Claire Lazar. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 190p. $80.00.

In the wake of 9/11, many political scientists and theorists in the United States of America turned their attention to the topic of emergencies. That required them to confront a fundamental question: Are emergencies to be studied as important in their own right, as altogether exceptional events that threaten the very existence of a society in unforeseeable ways? Or are they important, not because they are radically distinct from the normal situation of politics, but because they bring to the surface otherwise implicit aspects of normal politics?

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 2006. Before the Next Attack: Preserving Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan. 2002. Why Terrorism Works. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 1998. “Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture.” South African Journal on Human Rights 14: 1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2006. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2008. “The Compulsion of Legality.” In Emergencies and the Limits of Legality, ed. Ramraj, Victor V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2009. “The Puzzle of Martial Law.” University of Toronto Law Journal 59: 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2010. “The ‘Organic Law’ of Ex Parte Milligan.” In Sovereignty, Emergency, Legality, ed. Sarat, Austin. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní. 2006. Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1980. Second Treatise of Government, ed. MacPherson, C. B.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishers.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 2005. “The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11.” Perspectives on Politics 4(3): 605–7.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1969 (1912). Gesetz und Urteil: Eine Untersuchung zum Problem der Rechtspraxis. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian. 2009. “Our Schmittian Administrative Law.” Harvard Law Review 122(4): 10951149.Google Scholar
Walker, Clive. 2007. “Keeping Control of Terrorists without Losing Control of Constitutionalism.” Stanford Law Review 59(5): 13951463.Google Scholar
Yoo, John. 2005. The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeisberg, Mariah. 2009. “Should We Elect the US Supreme Court?Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 785803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar