Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:50:03.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cheap Labor: The New Politics of “Bread and Roses” in Industrial Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2008

Desmond King
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, University of Oxford. E-mail:[email protected]
David Rueda
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxfordand Merton College. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this article we aim to return labor (particularly the most vulnerable members of the labor market) to the core of the comparative political economy of advanced democracies. We formulate a framework with which to conceptualize cheap labor in advanced democracies. We propose that to understand the politics of cheap labor, the weakest members of the labor market need to be divided into two structural groups: those in standard and those in nonstandard employment. Standard cheap labor includes “regular jobs” while nonstandard cheap labor includes low-cost, flexible, and temporary jobs. We show that the use of cheap labor is significant in all industrialized democracies but that there are important contrasts in how different economies use cheap labor. We argue that there is a trade-off between standard and nonstandard cheap labor. Countries that satisfy their need for cheap labor through standard employment do not develop large nonstandard sectors of their economies. Countries that do not promote cheap labor in the standard sector, on the other hand, end up relying on an army of nonstandard workers to meet their cheap labor needs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentolila, Samuel, and Bertola, Giuseppe. 1990. Firing costs and labour demand: How bad is Eurosclerosis? Review of Economic Studies 57: 381402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, Tito, Hanson, Gordon, and McCormick, Barry, eds. 2002. Immigration Policy and the Welfare System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, George. 1999. Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics 17 (4): 607–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brücker, F., et al. 2002a. Immigration and the EU. In Immigration Policy and the Welfare System, ed. Boeri, Tito, Hanson, Gordon, and McCormick, Barry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brücker, F., et al. 2002b. European immigration policy. In Immigration Policy and the Welfare System, ed. Boeri, Tito, Hanson, Gordon, and McCormick, Barry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. 2001. Defending democracy: Reactions to political extremism in inter-war Europe. European Journal of Political Research 39: 431–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. 2005. Defending Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingeldey, Irene. 2004. “Welfare State Transformation between ‘Workfare’ and an ‘Enabling’ State.” Presented at the Espanet Conference, Oxford, September 9–11.Google Scholar
Doreinger, Peter B., and Piore, Michael J.. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
Dumenil, Gerard, and Levy, Dominique. 2005. Neoliberal income trends: Wealth, class and ownership in the USA. New Left Review 30: 105–47.Google Scholar
Eley, Geoff. 2002. Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1985. Politics against Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. 2006. Gendering the varieties of capitalism. World Politics 59: 142–75.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Varieties of Capitalism, ed. Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2000. “Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament on a Community Immigration Policy.” Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fine, Janice. 2005. Community unions and the revival of the American labor movement. Politics and Society 33: 151–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frade, Carlos, and Darmon, Isabelle. 2005. New modes of business organization and precarious employment: towards the recommodification of labour? Journal of European Social Policy 15: 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Gary. 1995. Modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states. International Migration Review 29: 881902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfield, Michael. 1989. The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Gingerich, Daniel. 2001. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis.” Presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David, eds. 2001a. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David 2001b. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism, ed. Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 2003. Social citizenship and workfare in the US and Western Europe: From status to contract. European Journal of European Social Policy 13 (3): 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Randall. 2002. Globalization, embedded realism and path dependence: The other immigrants in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 35: 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 2004. From class to culture. American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 400–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollifield, James F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets and States: The Political Economy of Postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis in Advanced Welfare States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. Equality, employment, and budgetary restraint: The trilemma of the service economy. World Politics 50 (4): 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration. World Politics 50: 266–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne L., Reskin, Barbara F., and Hudson, Ken. 2000. Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review 65 (2): 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in Britain and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Desmond. 1999. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond, and Wood, Stewart. 1999. The political economy of neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the 1980s. In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D., eds. 1999. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1996. “The Spiral of Inequality.” Mother Jones, November/December.Google Scholar
Lederer, Harold. 1998. “Illegal Migration.” Presented at Managing Migration in the 21st Century Conference, Hamburg, June 21–23.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. 2001. The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Friederike. 1994. Institutional regimes of part-time working. In Labor Market Institutions in Europe: A Socioeconomic Evaluation of Performance, ed. Schmid, Günther. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Martin, John. 1996. Measures of replacement rates for the purpose of international comparisons: A note. OECD Economic Studies, no. 26.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. 2005. Corporatism from the firm perspective: Employers and social policy in Denmark and Britain. British Journal of Political Science 35: 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo, and Swank, Duane. 2004. Does the organization of capital matter? Employers and active labor market policy at the national and firm levels. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 593611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Hugh. 1994. Employment protection and labor force adjustment in EC countries. In Labor Market Institutions in Europe: A Socioeconomic Evaluation of Performance, ed. Schmid, Günther. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 1993. Earnings Inequality. In Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 1994. The OECD Jobs Study. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 1996. “Earnings Inequality, Low-Paid Employment and Earnings Mobility.” In Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 2000. “Trends in Immigration and Economic Consequences.” Economic Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 2002. “Taking the Measure of Temporary Employment.” Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 2004a. “Employment Protection Regulation and Labour Market Performance.” In Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 2004b. “Statistical Annex.” In Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation, and Development. 2004c. Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. Income inequality in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, Michael. 1971. The dual labor market. In Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective, ed. Gordon, D.M.. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 1995. Explaining the decline of European social democracy. World Politics 47: 495533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2005. Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2006. Social democracy and active labour market policies: Insiders, outsiders, and the politics of employment promotion. British Journal of Political Science 36: 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 1982. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salverda, Weimer, Bazen, Stephen, and Gregory, Mary. 2001. The European–American Employment Gap. Final Report, LoWER, European Low-Wage Employment Research Network.Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, and Allan, James. 2006. Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 16: 5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman Jones, Gareth. 1984. Outcast London. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane, and Martin, Cathie Jo. 2000. Employers and the welfare state. Comparative Political Studies 34: 889923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, Peter A. 2002. Capitalists against Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapinos, Georges. 2000. Irregular migration: Economic and political issues. In Combating the Illegal Employment of Foreign Workers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2001. Varieties of labor politics in the developed economies. In Varieties of Capitalism, ed., Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in German, Britain, the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torfing, J. 1999. Workfare with welfare. Journal of European Social Policy 1: 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar