Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:50:25.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? The Dilemmas of Freedom of Expression and Democratic Persuasion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2010

Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider
Affiliation:
Brown University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hate groups are often thought to reveal a paradox in liberal thinking. On the one hand, such groups challenge the very foundations of liberal thought, including core values of equality and freedom. On the other hand, these same values underlie the rights such as freedom of expression and association that protect hate groups. Thus a liberal democratic state that extends those protections to such groups in the name of value neutrality and freedom of expression may be thought to be undermining the values on which its legitimacy rests. In this paper, I suggest how this apparent paradox might be resolved. I argue that the state should protect the expression of illiberal beliefs, but that the state (along with its citizens) is also obligated to criticize publicly those beliefs. Distinguishing between two kinds of state action—coercive and expressive—I contend that such criticism should be pursued through the state's expressive capacities in its roles as speaker, educator, and spender. Here I extend the familiar idea that law, to be legitimate, must be widely publicized; I contend that a proper theory of the freedom of expression obligates the legitimate state to publicize the reasons that underlie rights, in particular reasons that appeal to the entitlement of each citizen subject to coercion to be treated as free and equal. My theory of freedom of expression is thus “expressive” in two senses: it protects the entitlement of citizens to express any political viewpoint, and it emphasizes a role for the state in explaining these free-speech protections and persuading its citizens of the value of the entitlements that underlie them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 1005 - 1019
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Associated Press. 2009. “Neo-Nazi Group Resurfaces, Citing Obama,” New York Times (April 26): A19.Google Scholar
Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey. 2007a. Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey. 2007b. “The Politics of the Personal: A Liberal Approach.” American Political Science Review 101(1): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buruma, Ian. 2009. “Totally Tolerant Up to a Point” New York Times (January 29): A29.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone, and Kopstein, Jeffrey. 2001. “Bad Civil Society.” Political Theory 29(6): 837–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of Law v. Leo P. Martinez, 561 U.S. (2010).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. “A New Map of Censorship.” Index on Censorship 35(1): 131–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007. Rawls. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1993. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Holthouse, David. 2009. “The Year in Hate, 2008.” outhern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report 133, special issue (http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2009/spring/the-year-in-hate), accessed February 11, 2010.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C., Rohrschneider, Robert, Kymlicka, Will, and Laurence, Johnathan. 2008. “The Challenges of Multiculturalism in Advanced Democracies.” Perspectives on Politics 6(4): 801–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Thomas. 2004. What is Racism? (http://www.davidduke.com/general/what-is-racism_32.html), accessed February 11, 2010.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, David A. 2005. “From Alito's Past, a Window on Conservatives at Princeton.” New York Times (November 27): A1.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Charles III. 1993. “If He Hollers Let Him Go: Racist Speech on Campus.” In Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, And The First Amendment, eds. Matsuda, Mari J., Lawrence, Charles III, and Delgado, Richard. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1975. “On Liberty.” In Three Essays, ed. Wollheim, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1997. Socratic Puzzles. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 2004. “Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate.” Fordham Law Review 72: 1537–67.Google Scholar
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H., and Anderson, Elizabeth. 2000. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 1503–75.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999 [1971]. A Theory of Justice, revised ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2000. Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul. 2007. When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Richard W., and Lewis, Neil A.. 2006. “Democrats Take Aggressive Tack; Alito is Unfazed.” New York Times (January 12): A1.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. 1989. “Unconstitutional Conditions.” Harvard Law Review 102:1413–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “National Income and Product Accounts Table 1.1.5: Gross Domestic Product.” (http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=5&FirstYear=2006&LastYear=2007&Freq=Qtr), accessed February 3, 2008.Google Scholar
Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar