Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:27:41.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Puzzles versus Problems: The Alleged Disconnect between Academics and Military Practitioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2010

Michael W. Mosser
Michael W. Mosser
Affiliation:
Southwestern University, Georgetown, TX. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the halls of both academic and government buildings, the stories of the gap between theory and praxis are legion. Practitioners speak of misguided academics and armchair generals criticizing the creation of strategy and the conduct of operations from the safety of their universities. Moreover, and at a more fundamental level, practitioners are frustrated that academics just don't seem to “get” the policy world. Conversely, academics bemoan the fact that practitioners often fail to fully think through the problems they claim need to be solved. If they had, many scholars argue, they would understand that the “solution” to a “problem” either becomes a part of the problem itself, or creates a whole new set of problems. Whether one calls the gap between theory and praxis in international relations a difference, a disconnect, or a divide hardly matters. What matters is discovering whether or not it actually exists, and if so, what is being done to rectify it. I first describe and then challenge the conventional wisdom that irreconcilable differences separate the academy and military practitioners.

Type
Reflections Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 1077 - 1086
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buhaug, Halvard, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2008. “Disaggregating Ethno-Nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory.” International Organization 62(3): 531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Global Studies, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. N.d. “Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellowships.” (http://cgs.illinois.edu/resources/FLAS_fellowships/index.html), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Department of the Army. 2010. “Field Manual 5-0: The Operations Process.” Washington, D.C. (March 26).Google Scholar
Echevarria, Antulio J. 2005. “Fourth Generation War and Other Myths.” (http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=632), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Gates, Robert. M. 2008. “Speech to the Association of American Universities, as delivered by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, Washington, DC, Monday, April 14, 2008,” (http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1228), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Gentile, Lt. Colonel Gian. 2008. “Our COIN Doctrine Removes the Enemy from the Essence of War.” (http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2008/01/3207722), accessed 10 May 2010.Google Scholar
Glenn, David. 2007. “Anthropology Association Formally Disapproves of Military Program” Chronicle of Higher Education. (http://chronicle.com/news/article/3389/anthropology-association-formally-disapproves-of-military-program), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Kem, Jack. 2008. “CGSC Permanent Professor Program: A Modest Proposal.” (http://usacac.army.mil/BLOG/blogs/reflectionsfromfront/archive/2008/12/12/cgsc-permanent-professor-program-a-modest-proposal.aspx), accessed May 10,2010.Google Scholar
Kipp, Jacob W; Lester Grau, Prinslow, Karl, and Smith, Don. 2006. “The Human Terrain System: A CORDS for the 21st Century.” Military Review 86(5): 8–15.Google Scholar
Muckian, Martin J. 2006–07. “Structural Vulnerabilities of Network Insurgencies: Adapting to the New Adversary.” Parameters 36(4): 14–25.Google Scholar
Nau, Henry. 2008. as cited by J. Ann Tickner and Andrei Tsygankov, “Risks and Opportunities of Crossing the Academy/Policy Divide.” International Studies Review 10(1): 155–77.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2008. as cited by J. Ann Tickner and Andrei Tsygankov, “Risks and Opportunities of Crossing the Academy/Policy Divide.” International Studies Review 10(1): 155–77.Google Scholar
Peacock, James, Albro, Robert, Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, Fosher, Kerry, McNamara, Laura, Heller, Monica, Marcus, George, Price, David, and Goodman, Alan. 2007. “AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities Final Report November 4, 2007.” (http://www.aaanet.org/_cs_upload/pdf/4092_1.pdf), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Petraeus, David H. 2007. “Beyond the Cloister,” The American Interest (July–August 2007). (http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=290), accessed May 10,2010.Google Scholar
Roper, Daniel. 2008. “Global Counterinsurgency: Strategic Clarity for the Long War.” Parameters 38(3): 92–108.Google Scholar
Roussel, Violaine. 2008. “Occupational Logics and Political Commitment: American Artists Against the Iraq War.” International Political Sociology 1(4): 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social Science Research Council. “The Minerva Controversy.” (http://essays.ssrc.org/minerva/), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Army. 2010. “Field Manual 5-0: The Operations Process.” Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense. “The Minerva Initiative: Funded Research.” (http://minerva.dtic.mil/funded.html), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense. 2008. “First Minerva Research Initiative Awards Announced.” US Department of Defense news release, December 22. (http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=12407), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. 2008. Office of Postsecondary Education, International Education Programs Service. “Title VI Programs: Building a US International Education Infrastructure.” (http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/iegps/title-six.html), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Military Academy, West Point. “Military Faculty Positions: Frequently Asked Questions.” (http://www.eecs.usma.edu/hr/militaryfaq.htm), accessed August 11, 2010.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen. 2005. “The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, Sharon. 2008. [online piece for Wired magazine] entitled “Pentagon's Minerva Initiative Sparks New Anthro Concerns.” (http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/project-minerva.html), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar