Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:15:31.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2004

Thomas E. Mann
Thomas E. Mann
Affiliation:
W. Averell Harriman Chair and senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2002 enactment of the first major reform of U.S. federal campaign-finance law in a quarter century featured a more substantial engagement of political scientists—through research, public advocacy, and expert testimony—than had been the case in the past. This essay reviews the evolution of research on campaign finance from the early twentieth century to the present, the intellectual tensions between the scholarly and reform communities, the conditions in the 1990s that promoted collaborationamong these groups, and the continuing disagreements over how best to manage the problems associated with money and politics—in the United States and in democracies around the world.He gratefully acknowledges the research assistance of Emily Bailard, a Brookings summer intern from Yale University, and Larissa Davis. Bruce Cain, Anthony Corrado, and Trevor Potter provided valuable commentary as discussants when a version of this paper was presented at the 2002 meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston. Special thanks to Sarah Binder, Richard F. Fenno, Jr., Charles O. Jones, Sheilah Mann, Norman Ornstein, this journal's editors, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The author would like to note that he alone is responsible for whatever errors of fact and judgment remain.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 69 - 83
Copyright
2003 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich John1995 Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in AmericaChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Alexander Herbert1972 Money in PoliticsWashington, D.C.Public Affairs Press
Ansolabehere StephenGerber AlanJames M. Snyder Jr2001 Corruption and the growth of campaign spendingA User's Guide to Campaign Finance ReformGerald C. LubenowLanham, Md.Rowman and Littlefield
Ansolabehere Stephende Figueiredo JohnJames M. Snyder Jr2003 Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 1Google Scholar
Bartels Larry M.2000 Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952–1996 American Journal of Political Science 44 135 50Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M.1996 A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategy American Journal of Political Science 40 2352 371Google Scholar
Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law 2001 New study finds that parties' voter mobilization efforts are not dependent on soft money. Brennan Center Press Release, 3 JulyAvailable at www.brennan center.org/presscenter/pressrelease_2001_070301.html. Accessed 2 December 2002.
Brookings Institution 1996 Brookings Working Group on Campaign Finance ReformAvailable at www.brookings.edu/gs/cf/workgrp.htm. Accessed 2 December 2002
Buckley v. Valeo.424 U.S 1 (1976)
Campaign Finance Institute 2002 Available at www.cfinst.org. Accessed 2 December 2002
Campaign and Media Legal Center 2002 McConnell vs. FEC:Expert witness reports and fact witness declarationsAvailable at www.camlc.org/advocacy-court2-31.html. Accessed 2 December 2002
Campbell James E.2002 Is the House incumbency advantage mostly a campaign finance advantage?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England Political Science Association, Portland, Maine, 3–4 May
Citizens' Research Foundation 1997 New realities, new thinking: Report of the task force on campaign finance reformLos Angeles, CalifCitizens' Research Foundation, University of Southern California
Cohen MartyKarol DavidNoel HansZaller John2001 Beating reform: The resurgence of parties in presidential nominations, 1980 to 2000Paper prepared for presentation at the 2001 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 30 August–2 September
Corrado Anthony1997 Money and politics: A history of federal campaign finance lawCampaign Finance Reform: A SourcebookCorrado AnthonyMann Thomas E.Ortiz Daniel R.Potter TrevorSorauf Frank J.Washington, D.C.Brookings Institution Press
Corrado Anthony2000a Campaign Finance ReformNew YorkCentury Foundation Press
Corrado Anthony2000b Running backward: The congressional money chaseThe Permanent Campaign and Its FutureOrnstein NormanMann ThomasWashington, D.C.American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution
Democracy 21 Education Fund, Project FEC 2002 No Bark, No Bite, No Point: The Case for Closing the Federal Election Commission and Establishing a New System for Enforcing the Nation's Campaign Finance LawsWashington, D.C.Democracy 21 Education Fund
Dwyre DianaKolodny Robin2002 Throwing out the rule book: Party financing of the 2000 electionsFinancing the 2000 ElectionMagleby David B.Washington, D.C.Brookings Institution Press
Epstein DavidZemsky Peter1995 Money talks: Deterring quality challengers in congressional elections The American Political Science Review 89 2295 308Google Scholar
FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee. 533 U.S 431 (2001)
Alan Gerber1998 Estimating the effect of campaign spending on Senate election outcomes using instrumental variables The American Political Science Review 92 2401-11Google Scholar
Jay Goodliffe2001 The effect of war chests on challenger entry in U.S. House elections The American Journal of Political Science 45 4830-44Google Scholar
Green Donald Philip2002 Report on the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Defendants' expert witness testimony in McConnell v. FECU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Yale University, 23 September. Available at www.camlc.org/attachment.html/GreenDonald.Rpt.0923. pdf?id = 111. Accessed 2 December 2002
Green Donald PhilipJonathan S. Krasno1988 Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in House elections American Journal of Political Science 32 4884 907Google Scholar
Green Donald PhilipJonathan S. Krasno1990 Rebuttal to Jacobson's “New Evidence for Old Arguments American Journal of Political Science 34 2363-72Google Scholar
Green Donald PhilipBradley PalmquistSchickler Eric2002 Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of VotersNew HavenYale University Press
Hall RichardFrank Wayman1990 Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees The American Political Science Review 84 3797 820Google Scholar
Hasen Richard L.2001 Measuring overbreadth: Using empirical evidence to determine the constitutionality of campaign finance laws targeting sham issue advocacy Minnesota Law Review 85 61,771-807Google Scholar
Heard Alexander1960 The Costs of DemocracyChapel HillUniversity of North Carolina Press
Herrnson Paul S.1988 Party Campaigning in the 1980sCambridgeHarvard University Press
Jacobson Gary C.1978 The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections The American Political Science Review 72 2469-91Google Scholar
Jacobson Gary C.1980 Money in Congressional ElectionsNew HavenYale University Press
Kayden Xandra1977 Report of a conference on campaign finance based on the experience of the 1976 presidential campaign. Photocopy. The Campaign Finance Study Group of the Institute of Politics, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, October.
Kelley Stanley Jr2002 Political parties and the regulation of campaign financing. Princeton UniversityAvailable at www.brookings.edu/gs/cf/pubs.htm. Accessed 2 December 2002
Kolodny RobinDiana Dwyre1998 Party-orchestrated activities for legislative party goals: Campaigns for majorities in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 1990s Party Politics 4 3275-95Google Scholar
Krasno Jonathan S.2003 The electoral impact of “issue advocacy” in 1998 and 2000 House racesThe Medium and the MessageGoldstein KennethStrach PatriciaUpper Saddle River, N.J.Prentice-Hall
Krasno Jonathan S.Kenneth Goldstein2002 The facts about television advertising and the McCain-Feingold bill PS: Political Science 35 2207-12Google Scholar
Krasno Jonathan S.Donald Philip Green1988 Preempting quality challengers in House elections The Journal of Politics 50 4920-36Google Scholar
Krasno Jonathan S.Daniel E. Seltz2000 Buying Time: Television Advertising in the 1998 Congressional ElectionsNew YorkNew York University School of Law, Brennan Center for Justice
Krasno Jonathan S.Frank J. Sorauf1999 The joys of regulation: Making the “new” American parties responsibleUnpublished Manuscript Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law
Krasno Jonathan S.Frank J. Sorauf2002 Evaluating the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Defendants' expert witness testimony in McConnell v. FEC, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Yale University and University of MinnesotaAvailable at www.camlc.org/attachment.html/Sorauf.Krasno. Rptfinal.0923.pdf?id = 115. Accessed 2 December 2002
La Raja Raymond1999 The impact of soft money on state party behavior: Do soft money transfers increase the size of the party organization?Paper prepared for delivery at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Ga., 2–5 September
La Raja Raymond2001 Sources and uses of soft money: What do we know?A User's Guide to Campaign Finance ReformGerald C. LubenowLanham, Md.Rowman and Littlefield
Lochner ToddBruce E. Cain1999 Equity and efficacy in the enforcement of campaign finance laws Texas Law Review 77 71,891-942Google Scholar
Magleby David B.2000a Outside Money: Soft Money and Issue Advocacy in the 1998 Congressional ElectionsLanham, Md.Rowman and Littlefield
Magleby David B.2000b Dictum without Data: The Myth of Issue Advocacy and Party BuildingProvo, UtahCenter for the Study of Elections and Democracy, Brigham Young University
Magleby David B.2002 Financing the 2000 ElectionWashington, D.C.Brookings Institution Press
Magleby David B.2003 The Other Campaign: Soft Money and Issue Advocacy in the 2000 Congressional ElectionsLanham, Md.Rowman and Littlefield
Malbin Michael J.Thomas L. Gais1998 The Day after Reform: Sobering Campaign Finance Lessons from the StatesAlbany, N.Y.Rockefeller Institute PressDistributed by the Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
Mann Thomas E.1998 Deregulating campaign finance: Solution or chimera? Brookings Review 16 120-1Google Scholar
Mann Thomas E.2001 Political money and party finance International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences 3 1111,681-84Google Scholar
Mann Thomas E.2002a The FEC: Administering and enforcing campaign finance lawThe New Campaign Finance SourcebookAvailable at www.brookings.edu/gs/cf/cf_hp.htm. Accessed 2 December 2002
Mann Thomas E.2002b Lessons for reformersFinancing the 2000 ElectionDavid B. MaglebyWashington, D.C.Brookings Institution Press
Mann Thomas E.Anthony Corrado2002 The flow of money in federal electionsThe New Campaign Finance SourcebookAvailable at www.brookings.edu/gs/cf/cf_hp.htm. Accessed 2 December 2002
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC. 528 U.S 377 (2000)
Ornstein Norman J.2001 Eight modest ideas for meaningful campaign finance reformA User's Guide to Campaign Finance ReformGerald C. LubenowLanham, Md.Rowman and Littlefield
Ornstein Norman J.Thomas E. MannPaul TaylorMichael J. MalbinAnthony Corrado1996 Issued 17 December. Revised 7 May 1997. Reforming Campaign Finance. (Later released as “Five Ideas for Practical Campaign Reform” by the League of Women Voters Education Fund, 21 July 1997.) Available at www.brookings.edu/campaign finance/reformcf.htm. Accessed 2 December 2002
Overacker Louise1932 Money in ElectionsNew YorkMacmillan
Polsby Nelson W.1996 Money in presidential campaignsThe New Federalist PapersAlan BrinkleyNelson W. PolsbyKathleen M. SullivanNew YorkTwentieth Century Fund
Pomper Gerald1998 The alleged decline of American partiesPoliticians and Party PoliticsJohn G. GeerBaltimoreJohns Hopkins University Press
Potter Trevor1997 Issue advocacy and express advocacyCampaign Finance Reform: A SourcebookAnthony CorradoThomas E. MannDaniel R. OrtizTrevor PotterFrank J. SoraufWashington, D.C.Brookings Institution Press
Public Campaign 2002 Available at www.publicampaign.org. Accessed 2 December 2002
Ranney Austin1977 The impact of campaign finance reform on American presidential partiesPrepared for the Conference on Political Money and Election Reform: Comparative Perspectives, Davidson Conference Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 10 December.
Rohde David W.1991 Parties and Leaders in a Postreform HouseChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
Smith Bradley A.2001 Unfree Speech: The Folly of Campaign Finance ReformPrincetonPrinceton University Press
Snyder James M. Jr1990 Campaign contributions as investments: The House of Representatives, 1980–86 Journal of Political Economy 98 61,195-227Google Scholar
Snyder James M. Jr1992 Long-term investing in politicians, or give early, give often Journal of Law and Economics 35 115 44Google Scholar
Sorauf Frank J.1988 Money in American ElectionsGlenview, IllScott, Foresman and Company
Sorauf Frank J.1992 Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and RealitiesNew HavenYale University Press
Sorauf Frank J.1999 What BuckleywroughtIn IfBuckley Fell: A First Amendment Blueprint for Regulating Money in PoliticsJoshua Rosenkranz E.New YorkCentury Foundation Press
Squire Peverill1991 Preemptive fund-raising and challenger profile in Senate elections The Journal of Politics 53 41,150-64Google Scholar
Steen Jennifer A.2000 Money isn't everything: Selffinancing candidates in U.S. House elections, 1992–98. Ph.D. diss.BerkeleyUniversity of California
Stern Philip M.1988 The Best Congress Money Can BuyNew YorkPantheon Books
Stratmann Thomas2002 Votes for salePaper prepared for delivery at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, 29 August–1 September. Available at apsaproceedings.cup.org/Site/papers/022/022023StratmannT.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2002
Sullivan Kathleen M.1998 Against campaign finance reform Utah Law Review 1998 3 311-29Google Scholar
Wright John R.1996 Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and InfluenceBostonAllyn and Bacon