Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:08:00.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identities, Interests, and the Future of Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2004

Rogers M. Smith
Affiliation:
Rogers M. Smith is the Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. E-mail [email protected]

Extract

One of the central tasks facing any discipline is deciding what topics, among a vast range of possibilities, to feature in its research agenda. Once a discipline's practitioners have settled on the agenda, they must then determine what methods can best illuminate those topics. This essay argues that political science today needs to give higher priority to studies of the processes, especially the political processes, through which conceptions of political membership, allegiance, and identity are formed and transformed. To do this, we need to identify, to a greater extent than most political scientists have, the historical contexts of the conflicts and political institutions that have contributed to political identities and commitments, and our approaches must provide empathetic interpretive understandings of human consciousnesses and values. We cannot rely solely, or even predominantly, on efforts to identify abstract, ahistorical, and enduring regularities in political behavior such as those that prevailed during the behavioralist era of modern American political science. Nor can we depend primarily on approaches, ascendant in our discipline's more recent “rational choice” phase, that enhance our formal grasp of instrumental rationality. Those sorts of work can certainly offer important contributions, but in general they are most effective as elements in projects that rest extensively on contextually and historically informed interpretive judgments.Rogers M. Smith is the author of Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership (Cambridge University Press, 2003) and Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History (Yale University Press, 1997). For their feedback on earlier drafts of this essay, the author thanks discussants and audience respondents from the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association in September 2002, and the Yale Conference on Problems and Methods in Political Science in December 2002. He also thanks the editorial staff and anonymous reviewers of Perspectives on Politics for many helpful suggestions and corrections.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Copyright
© 2004 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdelal, Rawi. 2001. National Purpose in the World Economy: Post-Soviet States in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Abdelal, Rawi, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Alastair Iain Johnston, and Rose McDermott. 2003. Identity as a variable. Unpublished manuscript, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Available at www.wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/images/ID051103.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2004.
Armstrong, John A. 1982. Nations before Nationalism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.
Brady, Henry E., and Cynthia S. Kaplan. 2000. Categorically wrong? Nominal versus group measures of ethnic identity. Studies in Comparative International Development 35:3, 5691.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. 1982. Nationalism and the State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bromwich, David. 1992. Politics by Other Means: Higher Education and Group Thinking. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Brubaker, W. Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brubaker, W. Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. Beyond “identity.” Theory and Society 29:1, 147.Google Scholar
Bruland, Peter, and Michael Horowitz. 2003. Research report on the use of identity concepts in comparative politics. Unpublished manuscript, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Available at www.wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/images/ComparativeReport.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2004.
Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D'Souza, Dinesh. 1991. Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus. New York: Free Press.
DuBois, W. E. B. 1992 [1935]. Black Reconstruction in America. New York: Atheneum.
Fearon, James. 1999. What is identity (as we now use the word)? Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University. Available at www.wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/activities/confpapers/fearon2.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2004.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1995. The politics of legal integration in the European Union. International Organization 49:1, 17181.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1995. The Twilight of Common Dreams: Why America Is Wracked by Culture Wars. New York: Henry Holt.
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank Marlowe, John Q. Patton, Natalie Smith, and David Tracer. 2003. “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavior experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Available at www.hss.caltech.edu/∼camerer/overviewpaper.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2004.
Horowitz, Michael. 2002. Research report on the use of identity concepts in international relations. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Identity Project. Available at www.wcfia.harvard.edu/misc/initiative/identity/images/horowitz1.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2004.
Jackson, J. T. Ross. 2000. And We Are Doing It: Building an Ecovillage Future. San Francisco: Robert D. Reed.
Jung, Courtney. 2000. Then I Was Black: South African Political Identities in Transition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Katznelson, Ira, and Helen V. Milner. 2002. American political science: The discipline's state and the state of the discipline. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ira Katznelson and Helen Milner. New York: W. W. Norton.
Kim, Claire Jean. 2000. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laitin, David. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lustick, Ian, and Dan Miodwinik. 2000. Deliberative democracy and public discourse: The agent based argument repertoire model. Complexity 5:4, 1330.Google Scholar
Marquez, Benjamin. 2001. Choosing issues, choosing sides: Constructing identities in Mexican-American social movement organizations. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24:2, 21835.Google Scholar
Marx, Anthony W. 1998. Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Motyl, Alexander. J. 2002. Imagined communities, rational choosers, invented ethnies. Comparative Politics 34:2, 23350.Google Scholar
Newman, Saul. 2000. Nationalism in post-industrial societies: Why states still matter. Comparative Politics 33:1, 2141.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Reed, Adolph, Jr. 2000. Class Notes: Posing as Politics and Other Thoughts on the American Scene. New York: New Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1998. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schnapper, Dominique. 1998. Community of Citizens: On the Modern Idea of Nationality, trans. Séverine Rosée. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Schram, Sanford F., and Philip T. Neisser, eds. 1997. Tales of the State: Narrative in U.S. and Public Policy. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Scott, James. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, James. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1995. Law and politics in the European Union: A reply to Garrett. International Organizations 49:1, 18390.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1983. Theories of Nationalism. 2d ed. New York: Holmes and Meier.
Smith, Rogers M. 2001. Citizenship and the politics of people-building. International Journal of Citizenship Studies 5:1, 7396.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 2003. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, Deborah A. 1989. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly 104:2, 281300.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1986. Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate over Reformism. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
Walton, Hanes, Jr., and Joseph P. McCormick II 1997. The study of African American politics as social danger: Clues from disciplinary journals. In National Political Science Review 6, ed. Georgia A. Persons. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Walton, Hanes, Jr., Cheryl M. Miller, and Joseph McCormick II 1995. Race and political science: The dual traditions of race relations and African-American politics. In Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions, ed. James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.