Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:57:45.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gender Lacuna in Comparative Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Lisa Baldez
Lisa Baldez
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What accounts for the glaring inattention to work on gender within mainstream political science? Part of the problem lies in the substance of scholarship itself. The concepts, central questions, and key variables that predominate in the mainstream literature on comparative democratization and in the literature on gender and democratization have contributed to the gulf between them. But a more fundamental explanation lies in the starting assumptions of scholars in the two camps. Mainstream scholars rarely question whether gender is relevant to politics, and gender scholars rarely question whether gender isn't relevant to politics. I illustrate some ways in which gender could be incorporated into mainstream work, and discuss how gender research could be made more broadly comparative.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 199 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2003. Women's Movements and Democratic Transition in Chile, Brazil, East Germany and Poland. Comparative Politics 35 (3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. 2005. From the Editors. Politics & Gender 1 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan Carol, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2000. Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 703–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2003. Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Postcommunist Experience. World Politics 55: 167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri. 2004. Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race and the Extension of Suffrage. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Mahoney, James. 1997. Adding Collective Actors to Collective Outcomes: Labor and Recent Democratization in South America and Southern Europe. Comparative Politics 29 (3): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donno, Daniela, and Russett, Bruce. 2004. Islam, Authoritarianism, and Female Empowerment: What Are the Linkages? World Politics 56 (July): 582–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2002. Islam and Authoritarianism. World Politics 55: 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth J. 2000. Unfinished Transitions: Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela, 1936–1996. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 1997. Democratization in Africa after 1989: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Comparative Politics 29 (3): 363–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. Review Essay: Political Regime Change: Structure and Process-Driven Explanations? American Political Science Review 86 (4): 1028–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Zuckerman, Alan S.. 2009. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2002. Political Citizenship and Democratization: The Gender Paradox. American Political Science Review 96 (3): 535–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M. 1997. Nationalist Agendas and Women's Rights: Conflicts in Afghanistan in the Twentieth Century. In Feminist Nationalism, ed. West, Lois A.. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo Luis. 2001. Review Article: The Regime Question: Theory Building in Democracy Studies. World Politics 54: 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo Luis. 2004. Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 437–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Gerardo Luis, and Snyder, Richard Owen. 2007. Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Margaret. 2003. Right-Wing Women in Chile. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1995. Review: New Theoretical Perspectives on Democratization. Comparative Politics 28 (1): 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1986. Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. American Historical Review 91 (5): 1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull. 1994. Review: On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research. World Politics 47 (1): 135–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith, and Weldes, Jutta. 2007. Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(2): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2006. ‘Far from Ideal’: The Gender Politics of Political Science. American Political Science Review 100 (4): 507–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions: Women's Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Brigitte. 1999. Triumph of the Fatherland. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 2007. Do We Understand Each Other Yet? Troubling Feminist Encounters With(in) International Relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (2): 302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar