Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:16:18.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A discussion of Melissa Schwartzberg's Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposia: The Political Consequences of Majority Rule
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binder, Sarah A. 2014. “The Senate’s Partisan Fever (in 4 Charts).” The Monkey Cage Blog, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkeycage/wp/2014/07/22/the-senates-partisan-fever-in-4-charts/ ; accessed July 22. Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casella, Alessandra. 2012. Storable Votes: Protecting the Minority Voice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casella, Alessandra, Turban, Sebastien, and Wawro, Gregory. 2014. “Storable Votes and Judicial Nominations in the U.S. Senate.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 20461.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar