Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:30:35.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Dialogue - The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. By W. Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 251p. $85.00 cloth, $29.99 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Dialogue
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. 1992. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. “‘Small Change: Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted’.” New Yorker.Google Scholar
Hassanpour, Navid. 2014. “Media Disruption and Revolutionary Unrest: Evidence from Mubarak’s Quasi-ExperimentPolitical Communication 31(1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanpour, Navid, Borra, Erik, Barbera, Pablo, Jost, John, and Tucker, Joshua. “Hushed Dissent: Online Political Dialogue under Competitive AuthoritarianismUnpublished paper, Yale University, February 2014.Google Scholar
Lichterman, Paul. 1996. The Search for Political Community: American Activists Reinventing Commitment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2013. The Language of Contention: Revolutions in Words, 1789–2012. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar