Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:16:59.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who benefits from reduced reproduction in parasitized hosts? An experimental test using the Pasteuria ramosa-Daphnia magna system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

JON H. MAGEROY ,
ELDFRID J. GREPPERUD  and
KNUT HELGE JENSEN
JON H. MAGEROY*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway
ELDFRID J. GREPPERUD
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway
KNUT HELGE JENSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: Tel: +4741041653. Fax: +4755584450. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated whether parasites or hosts benefit from reduced reproduction in infected hosts. When parasites castrate their hosts, the regain of host reproduction is necessary for castration to be a host adaptation. When infecting Daphnia magna with Pasteuria ramosa, in a lake water based medium, 49 2% of the castrated females regained reproduction. We investigated the relationship between castration level, and parasite and host fitness proxies to determine the adaptive value of host castration. Hosts which regained reproduction contained less spores and had a higher lifetime reproduction than permanently castrated hosts. We also found a negative correlation between parasite and host lifetime reproduction. For hosts which regained reproduction we found no optimal level of castration associated with lifetime reproduction. These results support the view that host castration only is adaptive to the parasite in this system. In addition, we suggest that permanent castration might not be the norm under natural conditions in this system. Finally, we argue that a reduction in host reproduction is more likely to evolve as a property favouring parasites rather than hosts. To our knowledge this is the only experimental study to investigate the adaptive value of reduced host reproduction when castrated hosts can regain reproduction.

Keywords

host-parasite interactioncastrationfitness correlationadaptationenvironmentPasteuriaDaphnia
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 138 , Issue 14 , December 2011 , pp. 1910 - 1915
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coelho, M. V. (1954). Aςão des formas larvárias de Schistosoma mansoni sõbre a reproduςão de Australorbis glabratus. Publicacoes Avulsas do Instituto Aggeu Magalhaes 3, 39–53.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype: the Gene as the Unit of Selection, 1st Edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Day, T. and Burns, J. G. (2003). A consideration of patterns of virulence arising from host-parasite coevolution. Evolution 57, 671–676.Google ScholarPubMed
Decaestecker, E., Declerck, S., De Meester, L. and Ebert, D. (2005). Ecological implications of parasites in natural Daphnia populations. Oecologia 144, 382–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decaestecker, E., Vergote, A., Ebert, D. and De Meester, L. (2003). Evidence for strong host clone-parasite species interactions in the Daphnia microparasite system. Evolution 57, 784–792.Google ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. (2005). Ecology, Epidemiology and Evolution of Parasitism in Daphnia. National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology, Bethesda, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Ebert, D. (2008). Host–parasite coevolution: insights from the Daphnia–parasite model system. Current Opinion in Microbiology 11, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D., Carius, H. J., Little, T. J. and Decaestecker, E. (2004). The evolution of virulence when parasites cause host castration and gigantism. The American Naturalist 164 (Suppl.), S19–S32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. and Herre, E. A. (1996). The evolution of parasitic diseases. Parasitology Today 12, 96–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D., Rainey, P., Embley, T. M. and Scholz, D. (1996). Development, life cycle, ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Pasteuria ramosa Metchnikoff 1888: rediscovery of an obligate endoparasite of Daphnia magna Straus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 351, 1689–1701.Google Scholar
Ebert, D., Zschokke-Rohringer, C. D. and Carius, H. J. (1998). Within and between population variation for resistance of Daphnia magna to the bacterial endoparasite Pasteuria ramosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 265, 2127–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esch, G. W. and Fernandez, J. C. (1994). Snail-trematode interactions and parasite community dynamics in aquatic systems: a review. American Midland Naturalist 131, 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etges, F. J. and Gresso, W. (1965). Effect of Schistosoma mansoni infection upon fecundity in Australorbis glabratus. Journal of Parasitology 51, 757–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, S. R., Becker, C. and Cáceres, C. E. (2007). Parasitic castration: A perspective from a model of dynamic energy budgets. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47, 295–309. doi: 10.1093/icb/icm057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, H. (2001). Host fecundity reduction: a strategy for damage limitation? TRENDS in Parasitology 17, 363–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaenike, J. (1996). Suboptimal virulence of an insect-parasitic nematode. Evolution 50, 2241–2247.Google ScholarPubMed
Klüttgen, B., Dulmer, U., Engels, M. and Ratte, H. T. (1994). An artifical fresh-water for the culture of zooplankton. Water Research 28, R1–R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K. H., Little, T., Skorping, A. and Ebert, D. (2006). Empirical support for optimal virulence in a castrating parasite. PLOS Biology 4, 1265–1269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafferty, K. D. and Kuris, A. M. (2009). Parasitic castration: the evolution and ecology of body snatchers. TRENDS in Parasitology 25, 564–572. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.09.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, T. J. and Ebert, D. (2000). The cause of parasitic infection in natural populations of Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera): the role of host genetics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 267, 2037–2042. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obrebski, S. (1975). Parasite reproductive strategy and evolution of castration of hosts by parasites. Science 188, 1314–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, K. J. and Antonovics, J. (2002). Playing by different rules: the evolution of virulence in sterilizing pathogens. The American Naturalist 159, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. E. and Minchella, D. J. (2001). Snail-trematode life history interactions: past trends and future directions. Parasitology 123 (Suppl.), S3–S18. doi: 10.1017/S0031182001007843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirnadel, H. A. and Ebert, D. (1997). Prevalence, host specificity and impact on host fecundity of microparasites and epibionts in three sympatric Daphnia species. Journal of Animal Ecology 66, 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, P. F., Stjernman, M. and Little, T. J. (2008). Temperature-dependent costs of parasitism and maintenance of polymorphism under genotype-by-environment interactions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 1418–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01555.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed