Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:29:44.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Strains of Streak: A Virus Affecting the Tomato Plant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kenneth M. Smith
Kenneth M. Smith
Affiliation:
Potato Virus Research Station, School of Agriculture and Molteno Institute, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The symptoms produced by a green strain of tomato streak virus 1 upon a variety of Solanaceous plants are described. A yellow variant of the streak virus which appears to have arisen during the culturing of the green strain is also described. This variant produces local yellow spots upon all inoculated leaves of White Burley tobacco.

Healthy tobacco plants have been infected with the green strain of the streak virus by spraying them with a virus suspension from an atomiser.

The behaviour of the green and yellow virus strains when, co-existing in the tobacco plant is discussed.

Filtration through graded collodion membranes shows that the two strains have different filtration end-points and that therefore they can be separated by this means. The difference in filterability is considered to be a quantitative effect and cannot yet be assigned to difference in particle size.

Immunity tests have shown that a complete cross-immunity exists between the green and yellow strains of streak themselves, between them and two other strains of streak which produce local lesions and between the green and yellow strains and tobacco virus 1. No immunity was found between the streak viruses and those of tobacco necrosis, tobacco ringspot, tomato spotted wilt and potato virus X.

The yellow strain of streak produced local yellow spots on mature leaves of White Burley tobacco. This suggests that the chlorophyll is actually attacked by the virus, and that the formation of the chlorotic spots is not due merely to the inhibition of plastid formation by the virus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 1935 , pp. 450 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ainsworth, G. C. (1933). An investigation of tomato virus diseases of the mosaic, ‘stripe’, streak group. Ann. appl. Biol. 20 421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, G. C., Berkeley, G. H. and Caldwell, J. (1934). A comparison of English and Canadian tomato virus diseases. Ann. appl. Biol. 21 566–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawden, F. C. (1934). Studies on a virus causing foliar necrosis of the potato. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 116 375–95.Google Scholar
Duggar, B. M. and Johnson, B. (1933). Stomatal infection with the virus of typical tobacco mosaic. Phytopathology, 23 934–48.Google Scholar
Elford, W. J. (1931). A new series of graded collodion membranes. Journ. Path. and Bact. 34 505–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. H. (1933). Isolation of yellow-mosaic viruses from plants infected with tobacco mosaic. Journ. Path. and Bact. 23 964–74.Google Scholar
Kunkel, L. O. (1934). Studies on acquired immunity with tobacco and aucuba mosaics. Journ. Path. and Bact. 24 437–66.Google Scholar
McKinney, H. H. (1926). Virus mixtures that may not be detected in young tobacco plants. Journ. Path. and Bact. 16, 893.Google Scholar
McKinney, H. H. (1931). Differentiation of viruses causing green and yellow mosaics of wheat. Science, 73 650–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, P. A. and M'kay, R. (1932). The compound nature of crinkle and its production by means of a mixture of viruses. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 5 227–47.Google Scholar
Price, W. C. (1934). Isolation and study of some yellow strains of cucumber mosaic. Phytopathology, 24 743–61.Google Scholar
Salaman, R. N. (1933). Protective inoculation against a plant virus. Nature, Lond., 131, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffield, F. M. L. (1933). The development of assimilatory tissue in Solanaceous hosts infected with aucuba mosaic of tomato. Ann. appl. Biol. 20 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. (1931). On the composite nature of certain potato virus diseases of the mosaic group. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 109 251–67.Google Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. (1933). The present status of plant virus research. Biol. Rev. 8 136–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. and Bald, J. G. (1935). A description of a necrotic virus disease affecting tobacco and other plants. Parasitology, 27, No. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thung, T. H. (1931). Smetstof en plantencel bij enkele virusziekten van de tabaksplant. Hand. ned. ind, natuurw. Congr. 6 450–63.Google Scholar
Wingard, S. A. (1928). Hosts and symptoms of ringspot: a virus disease of plants. J. agric. Res. 37, No. 3.Google Scholar